Literature DB >> 20458621

Effectiveness of the immunofecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening in a large population.

Haiyun Yang1, Zhizheng Ge, Jun Dai, Xiaobo Li, Yunjie Gao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guaiac tests are the most widely used tests to detect colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their sensitivity is relatively low and results may be affected by various factors. Immunofecal occult blood test (IFOBT) is specific for human hemoglobin and does not require dietary restrictions. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of IFOBT for the screening of precancerous lesions and CRC.
METHODS: From July 2006 to June 2007, IFOBT was performed on 5,919 adults who received periodic health examinations in our hospital. The positive cases were examined by colonoscopy and a double-contrast barium enema. Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological analysis.
RESULTS: Positive IFOBT was detected in 314 of 5,919 cases (5.30%). Further examinations were made in 264 IFOBT-positive cases. Of these, 116 cases with colorectal cancer (16 cases) or precancerous lesions (94 cases with colorectal adenomatous polyps and 6 cases with active ulcerative colitis) were detected. The total detection rate of CRC and precancerous lesions was 43.94% (116/264). TNM classification of 16 CRC cases was as follows: TNM I in eight cases (50.00%), TNM II in seven cases (43.75%) and TNM III in one case (6.25%), indicating IFOBT can detect CRC in the early stages.
CONCLUSION: Regular IFOBT can detect precancerous lesions and CRC in early stages and can thus reduce mortality from CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20458621     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1264-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  26 in total

1.  Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  H Strul; N Arber
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Hemoccult should no longer be used for the screening of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H Bleiberg
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Protagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W S Atkin; J M A Northover
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Noninvasive testing for colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Daniel L Ouyang; Joseph J Chen; Robert H Getzenberg; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Cancer of the gastrointestinal tract: early detection or early prevention?

Authors:  P Rozen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Andrew J Overhiser; Shawn C Chen; Oscar W Cummings; Thomas M Ulbright
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Colorectal cancer screening adherence in a general population.

Authors:  Mark W Yeazel; Timothy R Church; Resa M Jones; Laura K Kochevar; Gavin D Watt; Jill E Cordes; Deborah Engelhard; Steven J Mongin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  5 in total

1.  Application of quantitative estimates of fecal hemoglobin concentration for risk prediction of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Chao-Sheng Liao; Yu-Min Lin; Hung-Chuen Chang; Yu-Hung Chen; Lee-Won Chong; Chun-Hao Chen; Yueh-Shih Lin; Kuo-Ching Yang; Chia-Hui Shih
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Proteomic serum biomarkers and their potential application in cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Anouck Huijbers; Berit Velstra; Tim J A Dekker; Wilma E Mesker; Yuri E M van der Burgt; Bart J Mertens; André M Deelder; Rob A E M Tollenaar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Screening for colorectal cancer: possible improvements by risk assessment evaluation?

Authors:  Hans J Nielsen; Karen V Jakobsen; Ib J Christensen; Nils Brünner
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 4.  Strategies for prevention of gastrointestinal cancers in developing countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmad Zia Shams; Ulrike Haug
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.413

Review 5.  Diagnosis and natural history of preclinical and early inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Iago Rodríguez-Lago; Yamile Zabana; Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.