Literature DB >> 16190274

Misconceptions and realities about teaching online.

Joan E Sieber1.   

Abstract

This article is intended to guide online course developers and teachers. A brief review of the literature on the misconceptions of beginning online teachers reveals that most accept the notion that putting one's lecture notes online produces effective learning, or that technology will make education more convenient and cost-effective for all concerned. Effective online learning requires a high level of responsibility for learning on the part of students and a reduction of the teacher-student power differential. This, in turn, has major implications for faculty and course development, student selection criteria, the cost of instruction, and the outcomes of education. Effective online teaching focuses on processes of learning rather than outcomes, and is consistent with modern principles of learning that emphasize focusing on issues of high interest to learners, teaching students to use skills of active and effective learning, providing prompt feedback, and enabling students to establish learning goals and employ alternative paths to achieving those goals. Multiple ways of operationalizing these goals online are presented. Tips are offered concerning selection of students who are capable of benefiting from the online experience, developing curriculum that is user-friendly, using resources that stimulate good writing and critical thinking, and limiting class size to a manageable number.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16190274     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-005-0002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  9 in total

1.  Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Use and abuse of the internet for teaching research ethics--commentary on "Misconceptions and realities about teaching online".

Authors:  Michael Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula.

Authors:  Vivian Weil
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Teaching ethics in science and engineering: effective online education.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird; Joan E Sieber
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Collective openness and other recommendations for the promotion of research integrity.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Acclimating international graduate students to professional engineering ethics.

Authors:  Byron Newberry; Katherine Austin; William Lawson; Greta Gorsuch; Thomas Darwin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Faculty perception of and resistance to online education in the fields of acupuncture, chiropractic, and massage therapy.

Authors:  Jan Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork       Date:  2010-09-28

8.  Delivering Multimedia Education in Clinical Biochemistry.

Authors:  Craig Webster; Andrew Wootton
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2006-07-01

9.  Using Interteaching to Promote Online Learning Outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher A Krebs; Stephanie A C Kuhn; Adam T Brewer; James W Diller
Journal:  J Behav Educ       Date:  2021-03-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.