PURPOSE: To determine the biological modulatory dose of SU5416, we employed a novel trial design, where "dose de-escalation" was based on demonstrable biological changes observed at the maximum tolerated dose. If such an effect was shown, dose de-escalation to a predefined dose level would occur to determine if the lower dose exhibited the same amount of pharmacodynamic effect as the higher dose. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ten patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled at each dose level. One of the following pharmacodynamic effects was considered significant: (a) a 35% decrease in microvessel density in sequential tumor biopsies and (b) a 35% decrease in blood flow within tumor as assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, soluble E-selectin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule, and plasma vascular endothelial growth factor were measured sequentially. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. Sequential tumor biopsies in all evaluable patients showed an increase in microvessel density. Only one patient met the intended pharmacodynamic end point of >35% reduction in blood flow. There was a significant increase in both soluble E-selectin and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule levels pretreatment versus levels at the time of removal of patients from study (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0007, respectively). Levels of serum fibrinogen rose with therapy. There was a trend toward increase in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels. CONCLUSION: SU5416 does not result in decreased blood flow in tumors or a decrease in microvessel density. This corresponds to the lack of clinical activity seen with this agent. Our clinical trial design termed dose de-escalation is a novel approach to determine the in vivo biological effects of targeted therapies in cancer patients.
PURPOSE: To determine the biological modulatory dose of SU5416, we employed a novel trial design, where "dose de-escalation" was based on demonstrable biological changes observed at the maximum tolerated dose. If such an effect was shown, dose de-escalation to a predefined dose level would occur to determine if the lower dose exhibited the same amount of pharmacodynamic effect as the higher dose. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ten patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled at each dose level. One of the following pharmacodynamic effects was considered significant: (a) a 35% decrease in microvessel density in sequential tumor biopsies and (b) a 35% decrease in blood flow within tumor as assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, soluble E-selectin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule, and plasma vascular endothelial growth factor were measured sequentially. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. Sequential tumor biopsies in all evaluable patients showed an increase in microvessel density. Only one patient met the intended pharmacodynamic end point of >35% reduction in blood flow. There was a significant increase in both soluble E-selectin and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule levels pretreatment versus levels at the time of removal of patients from study (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0007, respectively). Levels of serum fibrinogen rose with therapy. There was a trend toward increase in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels. CONCLUSION:SU5416 does not result in decreased blood flow in tumors or a decrease in microvessel density. This corresponds to the lack of clinical activity seen with this agent. Our clinical trial design termed dose de-escalation is a novel approach to determine the in vivo biological effects of targeted therapies in cancerpatients.
Authors: James P B O'Connor; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Gordon C Jayson Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Ji Hoon Park; Jong-June Jeon; Sung Soo Lee; Amar C Dhanantwari; Ji Ye Sim; Hae Young Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthew G Fury; Andrew Zahalsky; Richard Wong; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Eric Lis; Lucy Hann; Timothy Aliff; William Gerald; Martin Fleisher; David G Pfister Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2006-09-16 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Colin J Mooney; Govardhanan Nagaiah; Pingfu Fu; Jay K Wasman; Matthew M Cooney; Panos S Savvides; Joseph A Bokar; Afshin Dowlati; Ding Wang; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Susan M Flick; Paul H Hartman; Jose D Ortiz; Pierre N Lavertu; Scot C Remick Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.568