Martin Zweifel1, Anwar R Padhani. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Classically, the first step in the clinical development of drugs in oncology involves assessments of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). New paradigms are needed for antiangiogenic drugs and vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) as they are active at doses well below the MTD and as single agents their use might not translate into anti-tumour efficacy. MRI is able to assess the antivascular effects of antivascular drugs via changes in functional kinetic parameters; however, the usefulness of MRI in decision making has been questioned by many. OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to review the experience of using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in early clinical development of vascular directed anticancer therapies over the last decade. Thirty-nine phase I and II studies including data on more than 700 patients have been published as abstracts and/or papers, documenting DCE-MRI changes after the administration of antiangiogenic drugs and VDAs. DISCUSSION: Perfusion MRI is helpful in assessing whether mechanistic goals are achieved, in assisting dose selection for phase II studies, in selecting subpopulations enriched for response and in predicting patient benefit. Imaging tools are increasingly available. Future challenges for imaging include correlation with clinical measures of efficacy and determining relationships with blood and serum biomarkers.
INTRODUCTION: Classically, the first step in the clinical development of drugs in oncology involves assessments of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). New paradigms are needed for antiangiogenic drugs and vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) as they are active at doses well below the MTD and as single agents their use might not translate into anti-tumour efficacy. MRI is able to assess the antivascular effects of antivascular drugs via changes in functional kinetic parameters; however, the usefulness of MRI in decision making has been questioned by many. OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to review the experience of using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in early clinical development of vascular directed anticancer therapies over the last decade. Thirty-nine phase I and II studies including data on more than 700 patients have been published as abstracts and/or papers, documenting DCE-MRI changes after the administration of antiangiogenic drugs and VDAs. DISCUSSION: Perfusion MRI is helpful in assessing whether mechanistic goals are achieved, in assisting dose selection for phase II studies, in selecting subpopulations enriched for response and in predicting patient benefit. Imaging tools are increasingly available. Future challenges for imaging include correlation with clinical measures of efficacy and determining relationships with blood and serum biomarkers.
Authors: Milica Medved; Greg Karczmar; Cheng Yang; James Dignam; Thomas F Gajewski; Hedy Kindler; Everett Vokes; Peter MacEneany; Myrosia T Mitchell; Walter M Stadler Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-01-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Kenneth J Niermann; Arthur C Fleischer; Jessica Huamani; Thomas E Yankeelov; Dong W Kim; Wendy D Wilson; Dennis E Hallahan Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: A Perotti; C Sessa; A Mancuso; C Noberasco; S Cresta; A Locatelli; M L Carcangiu; K Passera; A Braghetti; D Scaramuzza; F Zanaboni; A Fasolo; G Capri; M Miani; W P Peters; L Gianni Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: K J Lankester; N J Taylor; J J Stirling; J Boxall; J A D'Arcy; M O Leach; G J S Rustin; A R Padhani Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-10-31 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: James P B O'Connor; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Gordon C Jayson Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Jong Cheol Lee; Ho Yong Lee; Chang Hoon Moon; Seung Ju Lee; Won Hyeok Lee; Hee Jeong Cha; Sungchan Park; Young Han Lee; Hyun Jin Park; Ho-Taek Song; Young Joo Min Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: David K Woolf; N Jane Taylor; Andreas Makris; Nina Tunariu; David J Collins; Sonia P Li; Mei-Lin Ah-See; Mark Beresford; Anwar R Padhani Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.039