Literature DB >> 16275869

Preservation from left ventricular remodeling by front-integrated revascularization and stem cell liberation in evolving acute myocardial infarction by use of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (FIRSTLINE-AMI).

Hüseyin Ince1, Michael Petzsch, Hans Dieter Kleine, Heike Schmidt, Tim Rehders, Thomas Körber, Carl Schümichen, Mathias Freund, Christoph A Nienaber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considering experimental evidence that stem cells enhance myocardial regeneration and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mediates mobilization of CD34+ mononuclear blood stem cells (MNCCD34+), we tested the impact of G-CSF integrated into primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) management of acute myocardial infarction in man. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were subjected to primary PCI stenting with abciximab and followed up for 6 months; 89+/-35 minutes after successful PCI, 25 patients were randomly assigned in this pilot study (PROBE design) to receive subcutaneous G-CSF at 10 microg/kg body weight for 6 days in addition to standard care, including aspirin, clopidogrel, an ACE inhibitor, beta-blocking agents, and statins. By use of CellQuest software on peripheral blood samples incubated with CD45 and CD34, mobilized MNCCD34+ were quantified on a daily basis. With homogeneous demographics and clinical and infarct-related characteristics, G-CSF stimulation led to mobilization of MNCCD34+ to between 3.17+/-2.93 MNCCD34+/microL at baseline and 64.55+/-37.11 MNCCD34+/microL on day 6 (P<0.001 versus control); there was no indication of leukocytoclastic effects, significant pain, impaired rheology, inflammatory reactions, or accelerated restenosis at 6 months. Within 35 days, G-CSF and MNCCD34+ liberation led to enhanced resting wall thickening in the infarct zone of between 0.29+/-0.22 and 0.99+/-0.32 mm versus 0.49+/-0.29 mm in control subjects (P<0.001); under inotropic challenge with dobutamine (10 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)), wall motion score index showed improvement from 1.66+/-0.23 to 1.41+/-0.21 (P<0.004 versus control) and to 1.35+/-0.24 after 4 months (P<0.001 versus control), respectively, coupled with sustained recovery of wall thickening to 1.24+/-0.31 mm (P<0.001 versus control) at 4 months. Accordingly, resting wall motion score index improved with G-CSF to 1.41+/-0.25 (P<0.001 versus control), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter to 55+/-5 mm (P<0.002 versus control), and ejection fraction to 54+/-8% (P<0.001 versus control) after 4 months. Morphological and functional improvement with G-CSF was corroborated by enhanced metabolic activity and 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in the infarct zone (P<0.001 versus control).
CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF and mobilization of MNC(CD34+) after reperfusion of infarcted myocardium may offer a pragmatic strategy for preservation of myocardium and prevention of remodeling without evidence of aggravated restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16275869     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.541433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  42 in total

Review 1.  Control of autocrine and paracrine myocardial signals: an emerging therapeutic strategy in heart failure.

Authors:  Vincenzo Lionetti; Giacomo Bianchi; Fabio A Recchia; Carlo Ventura
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Panoramic view of the Fifth International Symposium on Stem Cell Therapy and Applied Cardiovascular Biotechnology, April 2008, Madrid (Spain).

Authors:  Adolfo Villa; Ricardo Sanz; M Eugenia Fernandez; Jaime Elizaga; Indrig Ludwig; Pedro L Sanchez; Francisco Fernandez-Aviles
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Host tissue response in stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Techung Lee
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Angiogenic cells can be rapidly mobilized and efficiently harvested from the blood following treatment with AMD3100.

Authors:  Rebecca M Shepherd; Benjamin J Capoccia; Steven M Devine; John Dipersio; Kathryn M Trinkaus; David Ingram; Daniel C Link
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Cell-based therapies after myocardial injury.

Authors:  Hüseyin Ince; Christof Stamm; Christoph A Nienaber
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-12

6.  [Stem cell therapy for the regeneration of heart muscle].

Authors:  G Steinhoff
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  Multipotent stem cells in cardiac regenerative therapy.

Authors:  Ravi Karra; Sean M Wu
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 8.  Stem cell differentiation: cardiac repair.

Authors:  Michael Rubart; Loren J Field
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.481

9.  Ageing and endothelial progenitor cell release of proangiogenic cytokines.

Authors:  Erich Kushner; Gary Van Guilder; Owen MacEneaney; Jared Greiner; Jennifer Cech; Brian Stauffer; Christopher Desouza
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 10.668

10.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy for stem cell mobilization following anterior wall myocardial infarction: the CAPITAL STEM MI randomized trial.

Authors:  Benjamin Hibbert; Bradley Hayley; Robert S Beanlands; Michel Le May; Richard Davies; Derek So; Jean-François Marquis; Marino Labinaz; Michael Froeschl; Edward R O'Brien; Ian G Burwash; George A Wells; Ali Pourdjabbar; Trevor Simard; Harold Atkins; Christopher Glover
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.