BACKGROUND: Assessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has both therapeutic and prognostic implications. Low-power contrast echocardiography (CE) has the advantage of simultaneously assessing myocardial perfusion and LV remodeling. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of low-power CE to assess LV remodeling after AMI compared with unenhanced harmonic echocardiography (HE). METHODS: A total of 36 consecutive patients underwent HE, CE (SonoVue), and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging 7 to 10 days after AMI. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) were assessed. RESULTS: Absolute differences for LVESV and LVEDV between CMR and CE were significantly smaller than those between CMR and HE. CE estimate of LVEF more accurately classified patients into LVEF < 35%, 35% to 45%, and > 45% (agreement, 83%; kappa = 0.66 with CMR) compared with HE (agreement, 69%; kappa = 0.33 with CMR). CONCLUSIONS: Low-power CE is more accurate than HE for estimating LV remodeling after AMI.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Assessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has both therapeutic and prognostic implications. Low-power contrast echocardiography (CE) has the advantage of simultaneously assessing myocardial perfusion and LV remodeling. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of low-power CE to assess LV remodeling after AMI compared with unenhanced harmonic echocardiography (HE). METHODS: A total of 36 consecutive patients underwent HE, CE (SonoVue), and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging 7 to 10 days after AMI. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) were assessed. RESULTS: Absolute differences for LVESV and LVEDV between CMR and CE were significantly smaller than those between CMR and HE. CE estimate of LVEF more accurately classified patients into LVEF < 35%, 35% to 45%, and > 45% (agreement, 83%; kappa = 0.66 with CMR) compared with HE (agreement, 69%; kappa = 0.33 with CMR). CONCLUSIONS: Low-power CE is more accurate than HE for estimating LV remodeling after AMI.
Authors: Maureen M Henneman; Joanne D Schuijf; J Wouter Jukema; Eduard R Holman; Hildo J Lamb; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.952