Literature DB >> 21479955

Chromosome aberration measurements in mitotic and G2-PCC lymphocytes at the standard sampling time of 48 h underestimate the effectiveness of high-LET particles.

Ryonfa Lee1, Elena Nasonova, Carola Hartel, Marco Durante, Sylvia Ritter.   

Abstract

The relationship between heavy-ion-induced cell cycle delay and the time-course of aberrations in first-cycle metaphases or prematurely condensed G(2)-cells (G(2)-PCC) was investigated. Lymphocytes of the same donor were irradiated with X-rays or various charged particles (carbon, iron, xenon, and chromium) covering an LET range of 2-3,160 keV/μm. Chromosome aberrations were measured in samples collected at 48, 60, 72, and 84 h postirradiation. Linear-quadratic functions were fitted to the data, and the fit parameters α and β were determined. At any sampling time, α values derived from G(2)-cells were higher than those from metaphases. The α value derived from metaphase analysis at 48 h increased with LET, reached a maximum around 155 keV/μm, and decreased with a further rise in LET. At the later time-points, higher α values were estimated for particles with LET > 30 keV/μm. Estimates of α values from G(2)-cells showed a similar LET dependence, yet the time-dependent increase was less pronounced. Altogether, our data demonstrate that heavily damaged lymphocytes suffer a prolonged G(2)-arrest that is clearly LET dependent. For this very reason, the standard analysis of aberrations in metaphase cells 48 h postirradiation will considerably underestimate the effectiveness of high-LET radiation. Scoring of aberrations in G(2)-PCC at 48 h as suggested by several authors will result in higher aberration yields. However, when particles with a very high-LET value (LET > 150 keV/μm) are applied, still a fraction of multiple damaged cells escape detection by G(2)-analysis 48 h postirradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21479955     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-011-0360-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  44 in total

1.  Association between G2-phase block and repair of radiation-induced chromosome fragments in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Durante; Y Furusawa; H Majima; T Kawata; E Gotoh
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Complex chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes as a potential biomarker of exposure to high-LET alpha-particles.

Authors:  R M Anderson; S J Marsden; E G Wright; M A Kadhim; D T Goodhead; C S Griffin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Influence of the sampling time on chromosomal aberrations at G2 phase in Syrian hamster embryonic cells irradiated with different types of radiation.

Authors:  M Suzuki; K Nakano; K Suzuki; M Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Cancer risk from exposure to galactic cosmic rays: implications for space exploration by human beings.

Authors:  Francis A Cucinotta; Marco Durante
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 5.  Ion beam radiobiology and cancer: time to update ourselves.

Authors:  Emmanouil Fokas; Gerhard Kraft; Hanxiang An; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-08-12

6.  LET dependence of yield ratios of radiation-induced intra- and interchromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Bauchinger; E Schmid
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Chromosome aberration yields and apoptosis in human lymphocytes irradiated with Fe-ions of differing LET.

Authors:  R Lee; E Nasonova; S Ritter
Journal:  Adv Space Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.152

8.  Selection against chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  M S Sasaki; A Norman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Cell survival and radiation induced chromosome aberrations. II. Experimental findings in human lymphocytes analysed in first and second post-irradiation metaphases.

Authors:  M Bauchinger; E Schmid; H Braselmann
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Cytogenetic effects of densely ionising radiation in human lymphocytes: impact of cell cycle delays.

Authors:  E Nasonova; S Ritter
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

View more
  8 in total

1.  Modeling of chromosome aberration response functions induced by particle beams with different LET.

Authors:  Konrad Czerski; Agata Kowalska; Elena Nasonova; Polina Kutsalo; Evgeny Krasavin
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Chromosome damage in human cells by γ rays, α particles and heavy ions: track interactions in basic dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Bradford D Loucas; Marco Durante; Susan M Bailey; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts.

Authors:  D Nieri; F Berardinelli; A Antoccia; C Tanzarella; Antonella Sgura
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 4.  Radiation-Induced Chromosomal Aberrations and Immunotherapy: Micronuclei, Cytosolic DNA, and Interferon-Production Pathway.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Cytogenetically-based biodosimetry after high doses of radiation.

Authors:  Monica Pujol-Canadell; Jay R Perrier; Lidia Cunha; Igor Shuryak; Andrew Harken; Guy Garty; David J Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An updated view into the cell cycle kinetics of human T lymphocytes and the impact of irradiation.

Authors:  Evi Duthoo; Anne Vral; Ans Baeyens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  The high toxicity of DSB-clusters modelling high-LET-DNA damage derives from inhibition of c-NHEJ and promotion of alt-EJ and SSA despite increases in HR.

Authors:  Veronika Mladenova; Emil Mladenov; Shipra Chaudhary; Martin Stuschke; George Iliakis
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-10-03

8.  Differential Impact of Single-Dose Fe Ion and X-Ray Irradiation on Endothelial Cell Transcriptomic and Proteomic Responses.

Authors:  Bjorn Baselet; Omid Azimzadeh; Nadine Erbeldinger; Mayur V Bakshi; Till Dettmering; Ann Janssen; Svetlana Ktitareva; Donna J Lowe; Arlette Michaux; Roel Quintens; Kenneth Raj; Marco Durante; Claudia Fournier; Mohammed A Benotmane; Sarah Baatout; Pierre Sonveaux; Soile Tapio; An Aerts
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.