Literature DB >> 16271972

Helpers benefit offspring in both the short and long-term in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose.

Sarah J Hodge1.   

Abstract

Helpers in cooperative and communal breeding species are thought to accrue fitness benefits through improving the condition and survival of the offspring that they care for, yet few studies have shown conclusively that helpers benefit the offspring they rear. Using a novel approach to control for potentially confounding group-specific variables, I compare banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) offspring within the same litter that differ in the amount of time they spend with a helper, and hence the amount of care they receive. I show that pups that spend more time in close proximity to a helper are fed more, grow faster and have a higher probability of survival to independence than their littermates. Moreover, high growth rates during development reduce the age at which females breed for the first time, suggesting that helpers can improve the future fecundity of the offspring for which they care. These results provide strong evidence that it is the amount of investment per se that benefits offspring, rather than some correlate such as territory quality, and validate the assumption that helpers improve the reproductive success of breeders, and hence may gain fitness benefits from their actions. Furthermore, the finding that helpers may benefit offspring in the long-term suggests that current studies underestimate the fitness benefits that helpers gain from rearing the offspring of others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16271972      PMCID: PMC1599779          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  The cost of helping.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Helping effort and future fitness in cooperation animal societies.

Authors:  M A Cant; J Field
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A growth cost of begging in captive canary chicks.

Authors:  R M Kilner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need?

Authors:  R Kilner; R A Johnstone
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Cooperative breeding in mammals.

Authors:  M D Jennions; D W Macdonald
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Effects of helpers on juvenile development and survival in meerkats.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; A F Russell; L L Sharpe; P N Brotherton; G M McIlrath; S White; E Z Cameron
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Identifying teaching in wild animals.

Authors:  Alex Thornton; Nichola J Raihani
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups.

Authors:  Joan B Silk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The cost of dominance: suppressing subordinate reproduction affects the reproductive success of dominant female banded mongooses.

Authors:  M B V Bell; H J Nichols; J S Gilchrist; M A Cant; S J Hodge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Reproductive competition and the evolution of extreme birth synchrony in a cooperative mammal.

Authors:  S J Hodge; M B V Bell; M A Cant
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Helper effects on pup lifetime fitness in the cooperatively breeding red wolf (Canis rufus).

Authors:  Amanda M Sparkman; Jennifer Adams; Arthur Beyer; Todd D Steury; Lisette Waits; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Reproductive control via eviction (but not the threat of eviction) in banded mongooses.

Authors:  Michael A Cant; Sarah J Hodge; Matthew B V Bell; Jason S Gilchrist; Hazel J Nichols
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Strategic adjustment of begging effort by banded mongoose pups.

Authors:  Matthew B V Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Aggressive monopolization of mobile carers by young of a cooperative breeder.

Authors:  J S Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Variance in centrality within rock hyrax social networks predicts adult longevity.

Authors:  Adi Barocas; Amiyaal Ilany; Lee Koren; Michael Kam; Eli Geffen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Helpers at the nest improve late-life offspring performance: evidence from a long-term study and a cross-foster experiment.

Authors:  Lyanne Brouwer; David S Richardson; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.