Literature DB >> 20685697

Reproductive competition and the evolution of extreme birth synchrony in a cooperative mammal.

S J Hodge1, M B V Bell, M A Cant.   

Abstract

Reproductive events in animal societies often show a high degree of temporal clustering, but the evolutionary causes of this synchronization are poorly understood. Here, we suggest that selection to avoid the negative effects of competition with other females has given rise to a remarkable degree of birth synchrony in the communal-breeding banded mongoose (Mungos mungo). Within banded mongoose groups, births are highly synchronous, with 64 per cent of females giving birth on exactly the same night. Our results indicate that this extreme synchrony arises because offspring suffer an increased risk of infanticide if their mother gives birth before other females, but suffer in competition with older littermates if their mother gives birth after them. These findings highlight the important influence that reproductive competition can have for the evolution of reproductive synchrony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685697      PMCID: PMC3030886          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  7 in total

1.  Egalitarianism in female African lions.

Authors:  C Packer; A E Pusey; L E Eberly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Infanticide in the evolution of reproductive synchrony: effects on reproductive success.

Authors:  Tanja Poikonen; Esa Koskela; Tapio Mappes; Suzanne C Mills
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The ecology and evolution of reproductive synchrony.

Authors:  R A Ims
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Helpers benefit offspring in both the short and long-term in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose.

Authors:  Sarah J Hodge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats.

Authors:  Andrew J Young; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Cooperative breeding in groups of synchronously mating females and evolution of large testes to avoid sperm depletion in african striped mice.

Authors:  C Schradin; A A Kinahan; N Pillay
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.285

  7 in total
  22 in total

1.  The cost of dominance: suppressing subordinate reproduction affects the reproductive success of dominant female banded mongooses.

Authors:  M B V Bell; H J Nichols; J S Gilchrist; M A Cant; S J Hodge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Social and ecological drivers of reproductive seasonality in geladas.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tinsley Johnson; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Amy Lu; Thore J Bergman; Jacinta C Beehner
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Costly reproductive competition between females in a monogamous cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Martha J Nelson-Flower; Philip A R Hockey; Colleen O'Ryan; Sinead English; Alex M Thompson; Katharine Bradley; Rebecca Rose; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Policing of reproduction by hidden threats in a cooperative mammal.

Authors:  Michael A Cant; Hazel J Nichols; Rufus A Johnstone; Sarah J Hodge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Female competition and aggression: interdisciplinary perspectives.

Authors:  Paula Stockley; Anne Campbell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds: why are females not bigger and better armed?

Authors:  Andrew J Young; Nigel C Bennett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Explaining negative kin discrimination in a cooperative mammal society.

Authors:  Faye J Thompson; Michael A Cant; Harry H Marshall; Emma I K Vitikainen; Jennifer L Sanderson; Hazel J Nichols; Jason S Gilchrist; Matthew B V Bell; Andrew J Young; Sarah J Hodge; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A veil of ignorance can promote fairness in a mammal society.

Authors:  H H Marshall; R A Johnstone; F J Thompson; H J Nichols; D Wells; J I Hoffman; G Kalema-Zikusoka; J L Sanderson; E I K Vitikainen; J D Blount; M A Cant
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Reassessing the determinants of breeding synchrony in ungulates.

Authors:  Annie K English; Aliénor L M Chauvenet; Kamran Safi; Nathalie Pettorelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Resolving social conflict among females without overt aggression.

Authors:  Michael A Cant; Andrew J Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.