Literature DB >> 18647720

Aggressive monopolization of mobile carers by young of a cooperative breeder.

J S Gilchrist1.   

Abstract

Competition between young of the same brood or litter is of particular interest in the fields of behavioural and evolutionary ecology, because the competing individuals are likely to be closely related, where evolutionary theory predicts a greater degree of cooperation. Studies of cooperative breeding species typically concentrate on who contributes care to rearing young, and assume a passive role of the young. Relatively, little attention has been devoted to considering how intralitter competition between young affects the distribution of care in cooperative breeders. In banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) groups, the majority of pups each form a stable exclusive one-to-one association with an adult group member (its 'escort') that is its principal care provider. This paper presents experimental evidence that each pup aggressively defends access to its escort, preventing other pups approaching, and therefore monopolizes the care provided by its escort. Each pup travels with the group and follows its escort, around which its exclusion zone is fixed: a form of mobile territoriality. This represents a novel system of care of young in a mammal species, but has general implications for the study of the distribution of care of young, particularly in cooperative breeding species. Parents and helpers may provide biased care to young, not due to preference but due to the competitive actions of the young within the brood or litter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18647720      PMCID: PMC2603194          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Testing Hamilton's rule with competition between relatives.

Authors:  S A West; M G Murray; C A Machado; A S Griffin; E A Herre
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Spacing of fetuses and local competition in strains of mice with large, medium and small litters.

Authors:  N W Bruce; J R Wellstead
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1992-08

3.  Siblicide, family conflict and the evolutionary limits of selfishness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Early development of aggression in chickens: The relative importance of pecking and leaping.

Authors:  D W Rajecki; D R Nerenz; S J Hoff; E R Newman; V J Volbrecht
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Helpers benefit offspring in both the short and long-term in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose.

Authors:  Sarah J Hodge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dominance in vertebrate broods and litters.

Authors:  Hugh Drummond
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  Brood division in birds in relation to offspring size: sibling rivalry and parental control

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Helpers increase the reproductive potential of offspring in cooperative meerkats.

Authors:  A F Russell; A J Young; G Spong; N R Jordan; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Cooperative begging in banded mongoose pups.

Authors:  Matthew B V Bell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biased escorts: offspring sex, not relatedness explains alloparental care patterns in a cooperative breeder.

Authors:  Emma I K Vitikainen; Harry H Marshall; Faye J Thompson; Jenni L Sanderson; Matthew B V Bell; Jason S Gilchrist; Sarah J Hodge; Hazel J Nichols; Michael A Cant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Smelling fit: scent marking exposes parasitic infection status in the banded mongoose.

Authors:  Jessica Mitchell; Michael A Cant; Emma I K Vitikainen; Hazel J Nichols
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.624

3.  Live long and prosper: durable benefits of early-life care in banded mongooses.

Authors:  Emma I K Vitikainen; Faye J Thompson; Harry H Marshall; Michael A Cant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Female reproductive competition explains variation in prenatal investment in wild banded mongooses.

Authors:  Emma L Inzani; Harry H Marshall; Jennifer L Sanderson; Hazel J Nichols; Faye J Thompson; Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka; Sarah J Hodge; Michael A Cant; Emma I K Vitikainen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.