Literature DB >> 16270849

An evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment with adolescents with emotional-behavioral disorders in an educational setting.

Nancy W Paramore1, Thomas S Higbee.   

Abstract

Brief multiple-stimulus-without-replacement (MSWO) preference assessments were conducted with 3 adolescent boys with emotional-behavioral disorders in the context of their public school educational program. The reinforcing effects of stimuli identified as high, medium, and low preference were then evaluated using an alternating treatments design in which, following an initial baseline, stimuli were delivered contingent on on-task behavior. High-preference stimuli produced the highest percentages of on-task behavior for all 3 participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16270849      PMCID: PMC1226174          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2005.76-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges.

Authors:  G Dunlap; M dePerczel; S Clarke; D Wilson; S Wright; R White; A Gomez
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

3.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

4.  Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.

Authors:  J E Carr; A C Nicolson; T S Higbee
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

5.  A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments.

Authors:  D Cohen-Almeida; R B Graff; W H Ahearn
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

6.  A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.

Authors:  J Northup; T George; K Jones; C Broussard; T R Vollmer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.

Authors:  Edward J Daly; Nikki J Wells; Michelle S Swanger-Gagné; James E Carr; Gina M Kunz; Ashley M Taylor
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

2.  Increasing accurate preference assessment implementation through pyramidal training.

Authors:  Sacha T Pence; Claire C St Peter; Allison S Tetreault
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.