Literature DB >> 16268328

Risk communication in the clinical consultation.

Richard Thomson1, Adrian Edwards, Jenny Grey.   

Abstract

Modern healthcare and modern societies are facing up to the need for greater engagement of patients in treatment decisions. Shared and informed decision-making is replacing traditional paternalistic approaches to decisions; health policy both reflects and drives these changes. A critical contribution to better informed decisions by patients is the effective communication of risk in the clinical consultation. This is not straightforward, but there is a growing evidence base to improve performance in this area to the benefit of both patients and clinicians. The purpose of this review is to provide an accessible and practical guide to better communication of risk by clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16268328      PMCID: PMC4954174          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.5-5-465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  23 in total

1.  Functional status and long term outcome of stroke.

Authors:  Helen Rodgers; Richard Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-01-29

2.  Insecurity and risk in the consultation.

Authors:  Jeff Clark
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Pregnant Genetic Counselors in an Era of Advanced Genomic Tests: What Do the Experts Test Prenatally?

Authors:  Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Yael Hashiloni-Dolev
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence.

Authors:  Liesbeth Claassen; Lidewij Henneman; A Cecile J W Janssens; Miranda Wijdenes-Pijl; Nadeem Qureshi; Fiona M Walter; Paula W Yoon; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  A simple clinical predictive index for objective estimates of mortality in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Colin R Cooke; Chirag V Shah; Robert Gallop; Scarlett Bellamy; Marek Ancukiewicz; Mark D Eisner; Paul N Lanken; A Russell Localio; Jason D Christie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening.

Authors:  Peter H Schwartz; Eric M Meslin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Doubt and belief in physicians' ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makers.

Authors:  Lucas S Zier; Jeffrey H Burack; Guy Micco; Anne K Chipman; James A Frank; John M Luce; Douglas B White
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Practical guidance for evidence-based ICU family conferences.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Douglas B White
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Helping patients make informed choices about probiotics: a need for research.

Authors:  Richard R Sharp; Jean-Paul Achkar; Margaret A Brinich; Ruth M Farrell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Surrogate decision-makers' perspectives on discussing prognosis in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Leah R Evans; Elizabeth A Boyd; Grace Malvar; Latifat Apatira; John M Luce; Bernard Lo; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.