Literature DB >> 16263370

Phakic intraocular lenses.

Carlo F Lovisolo1, Dan Z Reinstein.   

Abstract

An analytical review of the data available in the field of phakic intraocular lens implantation was conducted. Particular attention was paid to the more critical issues of intraocular lens sizing and safety guidelines. A comprehensive, competitive analysis of different implantation sites, intraocular lens model designs, and safety guidelines has been included. Specialized biometry techniques, such as very high frequency ultrasound and Scheimpflug imaging, have been reviewed, and a critical review of commercial claims regarding intraocular lens technologies has been included. Clinical studies of phakic intraocular lenses demonstrate increasing promise for the correction of refractive errors not amenable to mainstream excimer laser refractive surgery. The main issues currently revolve around adequate lens design (VHF ultrasound study suggests that custom-design and sizing may be the most effective and safest approach for every phakic IOL model), because these devices will be required to remain physiologically inert and anatomically compatible with internal ocular structures and relations for several decades. The possibility of safe removing or exchanging the IOL should remain a feasible option over time. It is of utmost importance that we continue to critically evaluate current encouraging short-term outcomes, which are being extrapolated to the longer term by ongoing high resolution imaging and monitoring of the anatomical and functional relations of implanted phakic IOLs.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16263370     DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  45 in total

1.  Fluid dynamics simulation of aqueous humour in a posterior-chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central perforation.

Authors:  Takushi Kawamorita; Hiroshi Uozato; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Position-dependent accommodative shift of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses.

Authors:  K Schöpfer; A Berger; C Korb; B M Stoffelns; N Pfeiffer; W Sekundo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scan lateral dimension measurements.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Ronald H Silverman; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Correction of extreme hyperopia: artisan iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation for pseudophakia after clear lens extraction.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Pan-Pan Ye; Ke Yao; Zhao-Chun Li; Feng-Ying He; Jun-Ting Shi; Jun Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Explaining The Current Role Of High Frequency Ultrasound In Ophthalmic Diagnosis (Ophthalmic Ultrasound).

Authors:  D Jackson Coleman; Ronald H Silverman; Mark J Rondeau; Harriet O Lloyd; Suzanne Daly
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-01

6.  Kappa angles in different positions in patients with myopia during LASIK.

Authors:  Hui Qi; Jing-Jing Jiang; Yan-Ming Jiang; Li-Qiang Wang; Yi-Fei Huang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Modulation transfer function of intraocular collamer lens with a central artificial hole.

Authors:  Hiroshi Uozato; Kimiya Shimizu; Takushi Kawamorita; Fumiko Ohmoto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  [Scheimpflug photography for the examination of phakic intraocular lenses].

Authors:  M Baumeister
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Anterior chamber lens implantation in vitrectomised eyes.

Authors:  G S Negretti; M Lai; P Petrou; R Walker; D Charteris
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Comparison of Eyemetrics and Orbscan automated method to determine horizontal corneal diameter.

Authors:  Arvind Venkataraman; Sapna K Mardi; Sarita Pillai
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.