Literature DB >> 16262487

The role of visual and nonvisual information in the control of locomotion.

Richard M Wilkie1, John P Wann.   

Abstract

During locomotion, retinal flow, gaze angle, and vestibular information can contribute to one's perception of self-motion. Their respective roles were investigated during active steering: Retinal flow and gaze angle were biased by altering the visual information during computer-simulated locomotion, and vestibular information was controlled through use of a motorized chair that rotated the participant around his or her vertical axis. Chair rotation was made appropriate for the steering response of the participant or made inappropriate by rotating a proportion of the veridical amount. Large steering errors resulted from selective manipulation of retinal flow and gaze angle, and the pattern of errors provided strong evidence for an additive model of combination. Vestibular information had little or no effect on steering performance, suggesting that vestibular signals are not integrated with visual information for the control of steering at these speeds. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16262487     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Using vision to control locomotion: looking where you want to go.

Authors:  R M Wilkie; G K Kountouriotis; N Merat; J P Wann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed.

Authors:  Kristen L Macuga; Andrew C Beall; Jonathan W Kelly; Roy S Smith; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Limitations of feedforward control in multiple-phase steering movements.

Authors:  Steven R Cloete; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Testing the role of expansion in the prospective control of locomotion.

Authors:  Julien Bastin; David M Jacobs; Antoine H P Morice; Cathy Craig; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Looking at the task in hand impairs motor learning.

Authors:  Richard M Wilkie; Robyn L Johnson; Peter R Culmer; Richard Allen; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Blind(fold)ed by science: a constant target-heading angle is used in visual and nonvisual pursuit.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Igor Dolgov; Eric McManama; Charles Swank; Andrew B Maynor; Kahlin Kelly; John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

Review 8.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Environmental constraints modify the way an interceptive action is controlled.

Authors:  Antoine H P Morice; Matthieu François; David M Jacobs; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Gaze anticipation during human locomotion.

Authors:  Delphine Bernardin; Hideki Kadone; Daniel Bennequin; Thomas Sugar; Mohamed Zaoui; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.