Literature DB >> 23440726

Blind(fold)ed by science: a constant target-heading angle is used in visual and nonvisual pursuit.

Dennis M Shaffer1, Igor Dolgov, Eric McManama, Charles Swank, Andrew B Maynor, Kahlin Kelly, John G Neuhoff.   

Abstract

Previous work investigating the strategies that observers use to intercept moving targets has shown that observers maintain a constant target-heading angle (CTHA) to achieve interception. Most of this work has concluded or indirectly assumed that vision is necessary to do this. We investigated whether blindfolded pursuers chasing a ball carrier holding a beeping football would utilize the same strategy that sighted observers use to chase a ball carrier. Results confirm that both blindfolded and sighted pursuers use a CTHA strategy in order to intercept targets, whether jogging or walking and irrespective of football experience and path and speed deviations of the ball carrier during the course of the pursuit. This work shows that the mechanisms involved in intercepting moving targets may be designed to use different sensory mechanisms in order to drive behavior that leads to the same end result. This has potential implications for the supramodal representation of motion perception in the human brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23440726     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0412-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  21 in total

1.  Perception of heading is a brain in the neck.

Authors:  W H Warren
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The visual control of ball interception during human locomotion.

Authors:  A Chardenon; G Montagne; M J Buekers; M Laurent
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  An fMRI study of parietal cortex involvement in the visual guidance of locomotion.

Authors:  Jac Billington; David T Field; Richard M Wilkie; John P Wann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Predicting the position of moving audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neural systems in the visual control of steering.

Authors:  David T Field; Richard M Wilkie; John P Wann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effects of velocity and motion-onset delay on detection and discrimination of sound motion.

Authors:  Stephan Getzmann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Dynamic minimum audible angle: binaural spatial acuity with moving sound sources.

Authors:  D R Perrott; A D Musicant
Journal:  J Aud Res       Date:  1981-10

8.  Visual guidance of intercepting a moving target on foot.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Predicting three-dimensional target motion: how archer fish determine where to catch their dislodged prey.

Authors:  Samuel Rossel; Julia Corlija; Stefan Schuster
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; William H Warren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.