Literature DB >> 16261734

Intralocus sexual conflict and the genetic architecture of sexually dimorphic traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera: Piophilidae).

Russell Bonduriansky1, Locke Rowe.   

Abstract

Because homologous traits of males and females are likely to have a common genetic basis, sex-specific selection (often resulting from sexual selection on one sex) may generate an evolutionary tug-of-war known as intralocus sexual conflict, which will constrain the adaptive divergence of the sexes. Theory suggests that intralocus sexual conflict can be mitigated through reduction of the intersexual genetic correlation (rMF), predicting negative covariation between rMF and sexual dimorphism. In addition, recent work showed that selection should favor reduced expression of alleles inherited from the opposite-sex parent (intersexual inheritance) in traits subject to intralocus sexual conflict. For traits under sexual selection in males, this should be manifested either in reduced maternal heritability or, when conflict is severe, in reduced heritability through the opposite-sex parent in offspring of both sexes. However, because we do not know how far these hypothesized evolutionary responses can actually proceed, the importance of intralocus sexual conflict as a long-term constraint on adaptive evolution remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the genetic architecture of sexual and nonsexual morphological traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma. The lowest rMF and greatest dimorphism were exhibited by two sexual traits (head length and antenna length) and, among all traits, the degree of sexual dimorphism was correlated negatively with rMF. Moreover, sexual traits exhibited reduced maternal heritabilities, and the most strongly dimorphic sexual trait (antenna length) was heritable only through the same-sex parent in offspring of both sexes. Our results support theory and suggest that intralocus sexual conflict can be resolved substantially by genomic adaptation. Further work is required to identify the proximate mechanisms underlying these patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  26 in total

1.  Genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in the threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Authors:  T Leinonen; J M Cano; J Merilä
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Resolving intralocus sexual conflict: genetic mechanisms and time frame.

Authors:  Andrew D Stewart; Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Heritability and genetic correlation between the sexes in a songbird sexual ornament.

Authors:  J Potti; D Canal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Troy Day
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  QTL mapping for sexually dimorphic fitness-related traits in wild bighorn sheep.

Authors:  J Poissant; C S Davis; R M Malenfant; J T Hogg; D W Coltman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Genetic constraints on microevolutionary divergence of sex-biased gene expression.

Authors:  Scott L Allen; Russell Bonduriansky; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Sex-dependent expression of behavioural genetic architectures and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.