Literature DB >> 16261118

Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

Yoichiro Hatta1, Tateru Shiraishi, Hitoshi Hase, Yoshiyuki Yato, Seiji Ueda, Yasuo Mikami, Tomohisa Harada, Takumi Ikeda, Toshikazu Kubo.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Posterior cervical spinal cord shifting after selective single laminectomy associated with partial laminotomies was compared with that after bilateral open-door laminoplasty between the C3 and C7 levels in relation to the clinical results of each procedure.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical significance of posterior spinal cord shifting after extensive cervical laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Current techniques used for cervical laminoplasty for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) are consecutively performed between the C3 and C6 or C7 levels with expectation that the spinal cord will shift backward to keep it clear of anterior compression. However, the clinical significance of the posterior spinal cord shifting remains controversial, and there has been no report verifying it by comparing limited posterior decompression procedures with conventional extensive ones.
METHODS: Twenty-six patients with consecutive 2- to 3-level CSM who underwent selective laminoplasty (Group A) were enrolled in the study, and among 56 CSM patients who underwent bilateral open-door laminoplasty between the C3 and C7 levels, 25 who had consecutive 2- or 3- level stenosis identified by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging were used as controls (Group B). The recovery rate was calculated using preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores for each patient, and for each patient's magnetic resonance imaging, the postoperative cervical curvature index was obtained according to Ishihara's method and the magnitude of postoperative backward shifting of the spinal cord was measured.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the subjects in Groups A and B with respect to the spinal curvature index, preoperative JOA scores, and recovery rate, but the magnitude of the postoperative posterior shifting of the spinal cord was greater for those in Group B than for those in Group A. There was no correlation between the recovery rate and posterior shifting of the spinal cord for each group, and no correlation was also found between the curvature index and posterior shifting of the spinal cord.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of posterior decompression surgery for multisegmental CSM is not correlated with the magnitude of postoperative backward shifting of the spinal cord. Extensive and consecutive decompression performed in conventional cervical laminoplasties is therefore not always necessary for multisegmental CSM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261118     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184751.80857.3e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  Analysis of correlative risk factors for C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Haiying Wang; Xu Zhang; Bing Lv; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen; Dalong Yang; Zhilong Bai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

2.  Percutaneous ultrasonographic evaluation of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty: time-dependent changes.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Nakaya; Atsushi Nakano; Kenta Fujiwara; Takashi Fujishiro; Sachio Hayama; Toma Yano; Masashi Neo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical laminectomy of limited width prevents postoperative C5 palsy: a multivariate analysis of 263 muscle-preserving posterior decompression cases.

Authors:  Satoshi Nori; Ryoma Aoyama; Ken Ninomiya; Junichi Yamane; Kazuya Kitamura; Seiji Ueda; Tateru Shiraishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Relationship between the laminoplasty opening size and the laminoplasty opening angle, increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following open-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhenfang Gu; Aili Zhang; Yong Shen; Feng Li; Xianze Sun; Wenyuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Posterior surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: review article.

Authors:  Paul D Kiely; John C Quinn; Jerry Y Du; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-02-10

6.  C4/5 foraminal stenosis predicts C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Ho-Jin Lee; Jae-Sung Ahn; Byungkon Shin; Hoseok Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors.

Authors:  Chae-Hong Lim; Sung-Woo Roh; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sang-Ryong Jeon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The relationship between laminoplasty opening angle and increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following double-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhen-Fang Gu; Ai-Li Zhang; Yong Shen; Wen-Yuan Ding; Feng Li; Xian-Ze Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the relevance of the spinal cord back shift after posterior multilevel decompression. A systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Denaro; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Alessandra Berton; Giuseppe Salvatore; Luca Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Laminoplasty and laminectomy for cervical sponydylotic myelopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ronald H M A Bartels; Maurits W van Tulder; Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.