Literature DB >> 16260523

Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome.

Tracy Shevell1, Fergal D Malone, John Vidaver, T Flint Porter, David A Luthy, Christine H Comstock, Gary D Hankins, Keith Eddleman, Siobhan Dolan, Lorraine Dugoff, Sabrina Craigo, Ilan E Timor, Stephen R Carr, Honor M Wolfe, Diana W Bianchi, Mary E D'Alton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with an increase in chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformations, or adverse pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: A prospective database from a large multicenter investigation of singleton pregnancies, the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk trial, was examined. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: no ART use, use of ovulation induction (with or without intrauterine insemination), and use of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess association between ART and adverse pregnancy outcomes (significance of differences was accepted at P < .05).
RESULTS: A total of 36,062 pregnancies were analyzed: 34,286 (95.1%) were spontaneously conceived, 1,222 (3.4%) used ovulation induction, and 554 (1.5%) used IVF. There was no association between ART and fetal growth restriction, aneuploidy, or fetal anomalies after adjustment for age, race, marital status, years of education, prior preterm delivery, prior fetal anomaly, body mass index, smoking history, and bleeding in the current pregnancy. Ovulation induction was associated with a statistically significant increase in placental abruption, fetal loss after 24 weeks, and gestational diabetes after adjustment. Use of IVF was associated with a statistically significant increase in preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, placental abruption, placenta previa, and risk of cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo IVF are at increased risk for several adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although many of these risks are not seen in patients undergoing ovulation induction, several adverse pregnancy outcomes are still increased in this group. There was no increased incidence of fetal chromosomal or structural abnormalities in the women who used any type of ART compared with the women who conceived spontaneously. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16260523     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183593.24583.7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  66 in total

1.  Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Christos Coutifaris; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  A Molecular Perspective on Procedures and Outcomes with Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Monica A Mainigi; Carmen Sapienza; Samantha Butts; Christos Coutifaris
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and infertility treatment: a population-based survey among United States women.

Authors:  Brent C Monseur; Jerrine R Morris; Heather S Hipp; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Low first-trimester PAPP-A in IVF (fresh and frozen-thawed) pregnancies, likely due to a biological cause.

Authors:  Lauren P Hunt; A M McInerney-Leo; S Sinnott; B Sutton; R Cincotta; G Duncombe; J Chua; M Peterson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study.

Authors:  C Allen; S Bowdin; R F Harrison; A G Sutcliffe; L Brueton; G Kirby; J Kirkman-Brown; C Barrett; W Reardon; E Maher
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Superovulation alters the expression of endometrial genes critical to tissue remodeling and placentation.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Fan Wang; Teri Ord; Christos Coutifaris; Rui Feng; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Preimplantation stress and development.

Authors:  Sky Feuer; Paolo Rinaudo
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2012-12

9.  Placental inflammation and oxidative stress in the mouse model of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  J M Raunig; Y Yamauchi; M A Ward; A C Collier
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Abnormal implantation after fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Erica T Wang; Anupama S Q Kathiresan; Catherine Bresee; Naomi Greene; Carolyn Alexander; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.