Literature DB >> 28718082

Low first-trimester PAPP-A in IVF (fresh and frozen-thawed) pregnancies, likely due to a biological cause.

Lauren P Hunt1,2,3, A M McInerney-Leo4,5, S Sinnott6, B Sutton6, R Cincotta7,8, G Duncombe7,8,9, J Chua7, M Peterson10,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to confirm a difference in the first-trimester screen maternal biochemistry and false-positive rates (FPR) between pregnancies conceived spontaneously and those conceived via assisted reproductive technologies (ART).
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the complete population of women (17,889 pregnancies) who had undergone first-trimester screening between January 2004 and September 2009 at three private ultrasound clinics in Queensland, Australia was used in the study. The age, gestation, method of conception, ultrasound markers, biochemistry markers (PAPP-A, fβ-hCG), and type of biochemical analyzer platform (Brahms Kryptor, Immulite 2000) data was collated. Univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA), Spearman's rank nonparametric correlation analysis, and Binary Logistic Regression analysis were used to analyze data. Spontaneous pregnancies were used as controls. Results were considered significant when the p value was less than 0.05.
RESULTS: After exclusions, 16,363 singleton pregnancies, including 1543 conceived via ART, were analyzed. Results from the two biochemistry platforms, Brahms Kryptor and Immulite 2000 were significantly different (p < 0.001); thus, the data was divided for analysis purposes. PAPP-A was universally significantly lower in IVF pregnancies compared to spontaneously conceived pregnancies (p < 0.001). Using the Brahms Kryptor platform, ICSI was associated with significantly decreased PAPP-A (p < 0.046), and a significantly increased FPR (p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous studies IVF pregnancies had significantly lower PAPP-A levels supporting the need to appropriately adjust the combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) risk algorithm for IVF conceptions. The Brahms Kryptor and Immulite 2000 platforms are significantly different; however, the universally lower PAPP-A findings support the hypothesis that the lower PAPP-A is due to a biological cause.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined first-trimester screening; First-trimester maternal serum biochemistry; IVF; PAPP-A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28718082      PMCID: PMC5633581          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-0996-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  58 in total

1.  First trimester maternal serum free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy associated plasma protein A as predictors of pregnancy complications.

Authors:  C Y Ong; A W Liao; K Spencer; S Munim; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Effect of the method of conception and embryo transfer procedure on mid-gestation placenta and fetal development in an IVF mouse model.

Authors:  L Delle Piane; W Lin; X Liu; A Donjacour; P Minasi; A Revelli; E Maltepe; P F Rinaudo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The effects of human chorionic gonadotrophin, progesterone and oestradiol on trophoblast function.

Authors:  Jessie Z-J Chen; May H Wong; Shaun P Brennecke; Rosemary J Keogh
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  First trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: an evaluation of the DPC Immulite 2000 free beta-hCG and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A assays.

Authors:  Kevin Spencer
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.057

5.  Early pregnancy levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein a and the risk of intrauterine growth restriction, premature birth, preeclampsia, and stillbirth.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Emily J Stenhouse; Jennifer A Crossley; David A Aitken; Alan D Cameron; J Michael Connor
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.

Authors:  Victoria C Wright; Jeani Chang; Gary Jeng; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2008-06-20

7.  First-trimester screening markers are altered in pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  A C Gjerris; A Loft; A Pinborg; M Christiansen; A Tabor
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Influence of medically assisted reproduction techniques on crown-rump length and biochemical markers of trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bonne; Eric Sauleau; Nicolas Sananes; Cherif Akaladios; Catherine Rongières; Olivier Pirrello
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  IVF culture medium affects human intrauterine growth as early as the second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Ewka C M Nelissen; Aafke P A Van Montfoort; Luc J M Smits; Paul P C A Menheere; Johannes L H Evers; Edith Coonen; Josien G Derhaag; Louis L Peeters; Audrey B Coumans; John C M Dumoulin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Infant outcomes of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Carrie Williams; Alastair Sutcliffe
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Maternal serum levels of angiogenic markers and markers of placentation in pregnancies conceived with fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Milan Reljič; Admir Porović
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Transcription profile of the insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway during human ovarian follicular development.

Authors:  Jane Alrø Bøtkjær; Susanne Elisabeth Pors; Tonny Studsgaard Petersen; Stine Gry Kristensen; Janni Vikkelsø Jeppesen; Claus Oxvig; Claus Yding Andersen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.