Literature DB >> 16257417

The good, the bad and the discriminator--errors in direct and indirect reciprocity.

Hannelore Brandt1, Karl Sigmund.   

Abstract

This paper presents, in a series of simple diagrams, concise results about the replicator dynamics of direct and indirect reciprocity. We consider repeated interactions between donors and recipients, and analyse the relationship between three basic strategies for the donor: unconditional cooperation, all-out defection, and conditional cooperation. In other words, we investigate the competition of discriminating and indiscriminating altruists with defectors. Discriminators and defectors form a bistable community, and hence a population of discriminators cannot be invaded by defectors. But unconditional altruists can invade a discriminating population and 'soften it up' for a subsequent invasion by defectors. The resulting dynamics exhibits various forms of rock-paper-scissors cycles and depends in subtle ways on noise, in the form of errors in implementation. The probability for another round (in the case of direct reciprocity), and information about the co-player (in the case of indirect reciprocity), add further elements to the ecology of reciprocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16257417     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  27 in total

1.  The evolution of restraint in bacterial biofilms under nontransitive competition.

Authors:  Federico Prado; Benjamin Kerr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The evolution of judgement bias in indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Daniel J Rankin; Franziska Eggimann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Hanna Kokko; Jolanta Vrublevska; Mikus Abolins-Abols; Tatjana Krama; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Anti-social punishment can prevent the co-evolution of punishment and cooperation.

Authors:  David G Rand; Joseph J Armao; Mayuko Nakamaru; Hisashi Ohtsuki
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  The evolution of punishment through reputation.

Authors:  Miguel dos Santos; Daniel J Rankin; Claus Wedekind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Cooperation under indirect reciprocity and imitative trust.

Authors:  Serguei Saavedra; David Smith; Felix Reed-Tsochas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.

Authors:  David G Rand; Hisashi Ohtsuki; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Indirect reciprocity with negative assortment and limited information can promote cooperation.

Authors:  Eleanor Brush; Åke Brännström; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment.

Authors:  Erez Yoeli; Moshe Hoffman; David G Rand; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A unified framework of direct and indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Christian Hilbe; Martin A Nowak; Laura Schmid; Krishnendu Chatterjee
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.