Literature DB >> 19538415

Organisation of obstetric services for very preterm births in Europe: results from the MOSAIC project.

B Blondel1, E Papiernik, D Delmas, W Künzel, T Weber, R F Maier, L Kollée, J Zeitlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of the organisation of obstetric services on the regionalisation of care for very preterm births.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
SETTING: Ten European regions covering 490 000 live births. POPULATION: All children born in 2003 between 24 and 31 weeks of gestation.
METHOD: The rate of specialised maternity units per 10 000 total births, the proportion of total births in specialised units and the proportion of very preterm births by referral status in specialised units were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Birth in a specialised maternity unit (level III unit or unit with a large neonatal unit (at least 50 annual very preterm admissions).
RESULTS: The organisation of obstetric care varied in these regions with respect to the supply of level III units (from 2.3 per 10 000 births in the Portuguese region to 0.2 in the Polish region), their characteristics (annual number of deliveries, 24 hour presence of a trained obstetrician) and the proportion of all births (term and preterm) that occur in these units. The proportion of very preterm births in level III units ranged from 93 to 63% in the regions. Different approaches were used to obtain a high level of regionalisation: high proportions of total deliveries in specialised units, high proportions of in utero transfers or high proportions of high-risk women who were referred to a specialised unit during pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: Consensus does not exist on the optimal characteristics of specialised units but regionalisation may be achieved in different models of organisation of obstetric services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19538415      PMCID: PMC2941698          DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02239.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  28 in total

1.  Deregionalization of neonatal intensive care in urban areas.

Authors:  Embry M Howell; Douglas Richardson; Paul Ginsburg; Barbara Foot
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  European indicators of health care during pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period.

Authors:  Katherine Wildman; Béatrice Blondel; Jan Nijhuis; Paul Defoort; Chryssa Bakoula
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  The effect of birth hospital type on the outcome of very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Barbara Warner; M Judith Musial; Thomas Chenier; Edward Donovan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  The potential impact on costs and staffing of introducing clinical networks and British Association of Perinatal Medicine standards to the delivery of neonatal care.

Authors:  E S Draper; B N Manktelow; C McCabe; D J Field
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Inborn/outborn status and neonatal survival: a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies.

Authors:  R J Ozminkowski; P M Wortman; D W Roloff
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Organisation of perinatal/neonatal care.

Authors:  P R Swyer
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Suppl       Date:  1993-01

7.  Is more neonatal intensive care always better? Insights from a cross-national comparison of reproductive care.

Authors:  Lindsay A Thompson; David C Goodman; George A Little
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Newborn intensive care and neonatal mortality in low-birth-weight infants: a population study.

Authors:  N Paneth; J L Kiely; S Wallenstein; M Marcus; J Pakter; M Susser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Maternal and neonatal transport: results of a national collaborative survey of preterm and very low birth weight infants in The Netherlands.

Authors:  L A Kollée; P P Verloove-Vanhorick; R A Verwey; R Brand; J H Ruys
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Maternal characteristics associated with place of delivery and neonatal mortality rates among very-low-birthweight infants, Georgia.

Authors:  Julia L Samuelson; James W Buehler; Dianne Norris; Ramses Sadek
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.980

View more
  5 in total

1.  Disentangling the effects of risk factors and clinical care on subnational variation in early neonatal mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Lahn D Straney; Stephen S Lim; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A novel classification for evaluating episiotomy practices: application to the Burgundy perinatal network.

Authors:  Thomas Desplanches; Emilie Szczepanski; Jonathan Cottenet; Denis Semama; Catherine Quantin; Paul Sagot
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Improved Macro- and Micronutrient Supply for Favorable Growth and Metabolomic Profile with Standardized Parenteral Nutrition Solutions for Very Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Alida Kindt; Yvonne Kraus; David Rasp; Kai M Foerster; Narges Ahmidi; Andreas W Flemmer; Susanne Herber-Jonat; Florian Heinen; Heike Weigand; Thomas Hankemeier; Berthold Koletzko; Jan Krumsiek; Juergen Babl; Anne Hilgendorff
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  Varying gestational age patterns in cesarean delivery: an international comparison.

Authors:  Marie Delnord; Béatrice Blondel; Nicolas Drewniak; Kari Klungsøyr; Francisco Bolumar; Ashna Mohangoo; Mika Gissler; Katarzyna Szamotulska; Nicholas Lack; Jan Nijhuis; Petr Velebil; Luule Sakkeus; James Chalmers; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.