Literature DB >> 16256360

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: long-term follow-up.

Maria Costanza Meazzini1, Fabio Mazzoleni, Canzi Gabriele, Alberto Bozzetti.   

Abstract

AIM: Prospective, longitudinal, clinical long-term follow-up study of a homogeneous sample of children affected by hemifacial microsomia and treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis. MATERIAL: Eight patients affected by types I and II hemifacial microsomia were operated on at an average age of 5.6 years with an average follow-up of 5.8 years.
METHODS: Vertical changes were measured on postero-anterior cephalometric and panoramic radiographs taken sequentially.
RESULTS: Angular changes of the infraorbital and nasal floor planes were not significant, showing that distraction osteogenesis starting after 5 years of age did not influence the maxillary skeletal base. Occlusal (plane) cant was reduced by 7 degrees on average following distraction osteogenesis, showing good dentoalveolar plasticity. Mandibular vertical changes showed a gradual return of the asymmetry, with growth in all patients (the ratio between affected and non-affected rami returned by 77% of the correction obtained by means of distraction 5 years postoperatively).
CONCLUSION: Although aesthetic and psychological advantages of distraction osteogenesis are well accepted it should only be applied after careful patient selection and honest explanation of the long-term recurrence by genetically determined craniofacial growth patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16256360     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2005.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  7 in total

1.  The use of mandibular body distraction in hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Hideo Nakajima; Hisao Ogata; Kazuo Kishi
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 2.  Craniofacial malformations and the orthodontist.

Authors:  A Akram; M M McKnight; H Bellardie; V Beale; R D Evans
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  A systematic review on the outcome of distraction osteogenesis in TMJ ankylosis.

Authors:  Ankita Chugh; Divya Mehrotra; Pradeep K Yadav
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-07-16

4.  Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a long-term study.

Authors:  Angela Chow; Hao-Fu Lee; Mary Trahar; Henry Kawamoto; Heleni Vastardis; Kang Ting
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Surgical Classification of the Mandibular Deformity in Craniofacial Microsomia Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jordan W Swanson; Brianne T Mitchell; Jason A Wink; Jesse A Taylor; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-02-05

6.  Real-Time Wireless Platform for In Vivo Monitoring of Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Pablo Blázquez-Carmona; Manuel Sanchez-Raya; Juan Mora-Macías; Juan Antonio Gómez-Galán; Jaime Domínguez; Esther Reina-Romo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Three-dimensional functional unit analysis of hemifacial microsomia mandible-a preliminary report.

Authors:  Ji Wook Choi; Byung Hoon Kim; Hyung Soo Kim; Tae Hoon Yu; Bong Chul Kim; Sang-Hwy Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-09-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.