Literature DB >> 19061798

Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a long-term study.

Angela Chow1, Hao-Fu Lee, Mary Trahar, Henry Kawamoto, Heleni Vastardis, Kang Ting.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Distraction osteogenesis has gained popularity because of the hypothesized concurrent soft-tissue expansion, which is believed to reduce postoperative relapse. Although many articles describe the immediate success of mandibular distraction, little research has been done on its long-term stability. Our goal was to examine the long-term craniofacial changes after distraction.
METHODS: Four hemifacial microsomic patients treated with unilateral mandibular distraction were recalled. Changes in maxillary width and height, occlusal height, ramus height, mandibular length, and chin position were quantified by using the posteroanterior and 45 degrees lateral oblique cephalographs. Predistraction and postdistraction measurements were taken over a 5-year period. The data were analyzed by using paired t tests and ANOVA.
RESULTS: Maxillary height, ramus height, mandibular length, and chin point deviation all experienced moderate improvement after distraction. Although the growth patterns between the control side and the treated side were comparable until 2 years after removal of the device, the normal side outgrew the affected side thereafter until 5 years after distraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the greater inherent growth potential of the unaffected side, more overcorrection than originally believed is needed to offset the persistent asymmetry in growing hemifacial microsomia patients who undergo unilateral distraction osteogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19061798      PMCID: PMC2866070          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  29 in total

1.  Facial symmetry after distraction osteogenesis and orthodontic therapy.

Authors:  A Tehranchi; H Behnia
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Maxillo-mandibular distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia in children.

Authors:  Kaneshige Satoh; Hiroyuki Suzuki; Tetsushi Uemura; Yoshiaki Hosaka
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  3-D volume imaging for dentistry: a new dimension.

Authors:  Robert A Danforth; Ivan Dus; James Mah
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-11

4.  Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites.

Authors:  David C Hatcher; Craig Dial; Camille Mayorga
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-11

5.  Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Mary Trahar; Robert Sheffield; Henry Kawamoto; Hao-Fu Lee; Kang Ting
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Mandibular lengthening using preprogrammed intraoral tooth-borne distraction devices.

Authors:  S Dessner; Y Razdolsky; T El-Bialy; C A Evans
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 7.  Two-year follow-up of distraction osteogenesis: its effect on mandibular ramus height in hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  I M Marquez; L C Fish; J P Stella
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Distraction osteogenesis of the ascending ramus for mandibular hypoplasia using extraoral or intraoral devices: a report of 8 cases.

Authors:  P Rubio-Bueno; A Padrón; E Villa; F J Díaz-González
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 9.  Is early osteodistraction a solution for the ascending ramus compartment in hemifacial microsomia? A literature study.

Authors:  Maurice Y Mommaerts; Krisztián Nagy
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices.

Authors:  P J van Strijen; K H Breuning; A G Becking; F B T Perdijk; D B Tuinzing
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Maxillary molar intrusion with zygomatic anchorage in open bite treatment: lateral and oblique cephalometric evaluation.

Authors:  Talles Fernando Medeiros de Oliveira; Cecília Yuriko Nakao; João Roberto Gonçalves; Ary Santos-Pinto
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-07-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.