Literature DB >> 24205479

The use of mandibular body distraction in hemifacial microsomia.

Yoshiaki Sakamoto1, Hideo Nakajima, Hisao Ogata, Kazuo Kishi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goals of treatment for hemifacial microsomia include horizontalization of occlusal plane and acquisition of facial symmetry. Although horizontalization of occlusal plane can be easily achieved, facial symmetry, particularly in relation to mandibular contour, can be difficult to attain. Soft tissue is generally reconstructed to correct facial asymmetry, and no studies have described correction of facial asymmetry through skeletal reconstruction. CASE: A 12-year-old girl presented with grade IIb right-sided hemifacial microsomia. She was treated using Nakajima's angle-variable internal distraction (NAVID) system for mandibular body distraction.
RESULTS: Following treatment, appropriate facial symmetry was achieved, and the patient was extremely satisfied with the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, we successfully treated the present patient by our novel method involving distraction osteogenesis. This method was effective and useful for several reasons including; the changes were not accompanied by postoperative tissue absorption, donor sites were not involved, and the treatment outcome could be reevaluated by adjusting distraction while the patient's appearance was being remodeled.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distraction osteogenesis; hemifacial microsomia; mandibular body distraction; mentular distraction

Year:  2013        PMID: 24205479      PMCID: PMC3814668          DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.119211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 2231-0746


  5 in total

1.  Condyle as the point of rotation for 3-D planning of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  Jun-Young Paeng; Jee-Ho Lee; Jong-Ho Lee; Myung-Jin Kim
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: a new technique using two distractors.

Authors:  Paolo Scolozzi; Georges Herzog; Bertrand Jaques
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Maria Costanza Meazzini; Fabio Mazzoleni; Canzi Gabriele; Alberto Bozzetti
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia.

Authors:  Hideo Nakajima; Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Ikkei Tamada; Hisao Ogata; Kazuo Kishi; Teruo Sakamoto
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Current practice of distraction osteogenesis for craniofacial anomalies in Europe: a web based survey.

Authors:  Rania M Nada; Adrian W Sugar; Maarten G M M Wijdeveld; Wilfred A Borstlap; Luigi Clauser; Bodo Hoffmeister; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 2.078

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Surgical Classification of the Mandibular Deformity in Craniofacial Microsomia Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jordan W Swanson; Brianne T Mitchell; Jason A Wink; Jesse A Taylor; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-02-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.