Literature DB >> 16253781

Mapping of nodal disease in locally advanced prostate cancer: rethinking the clinical target volume for pelvic nodal irradiation based on vascular rather than bony anatomy.

Helen A Shih1, Mukesh Harisinghani, Anthony L Zietman, John A Wolfgang, Mansi Saksena, Ralph Weissleder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Toxicity from pelvic irradiation could be reduced if fields were limited to likely areas of nodal involvement rather than using the standard "four-field box." We employed a novel magnetic resonance lymphangiographic technique to highlight the likely sites of occult nodal metastasis from prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen prostate cancer patients with pathologically confirmed node-positive disease had a total of 69 pathologic nodes identifiable by lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI and semiquantitative nodal analysis. Fourteen of these nodes were in the para-aortic region, and 55 were in the pelvis. The position of each of these malignant nodes was mapped to a common template based on its relation to skeletal or vascular anatomy.
RESULTS: Relative to skeletal anatomy, nodes covered a diffuse volume from the mid lumbar spine to the superior pubic ramus and along the sacrum and pelvic side walls. In contrast, the nodal metastases mapped much more tightly relative to the large pelvic vessels. A proposed pelvic clinical target volume to encompass the region at greatest risk of containing occult nodal metastases would include a 2.0-cm radial expansion volume around the distal common iliac and proximal external and internal iliac vessels that would encompass 94.5% of the pelvic nodes at risk as defined by our node-positive prostate cancer patient cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Nodal metastases from prostate cancer are largely localized along the major pelvic vasculature. Defining nodal radiation treatment portals based on vascular rather than bony anatomy may allow for a significant decrease in normal pelvic tissue irradiation and its associated toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253781     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  22 in total

Review 1.  Treating metastatic cancer with nanotechnology.

Authors:  Avi Schroeder; Daniel A Heller; Monte M Winslow; James E Dahlman; George W Pratt; Robert Langer; Tyler Jacks; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Toxicity after intensity-modulated, image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Sami Ok; Bülent Polat; Reinhart A Sweeney; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Monitoring response, prediction methodology, staging, and imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  David Pomerantz; Nicholas Vogelzang
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

4.  Mapping patterns of nodal metastases in esophageal carcinoma: rethinking the clinical target volume for supraclavicular nodal irradiation.

Authors:  Yijun Luo; Yuhui Liu; Xiaoli Wang; Bin Zhang; Jinming Yu; Chengang Wang; Yong Huang; Minghuan Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Nanotechnology in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Andrew Z Wang; Joel E Tepper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Ferumoxtran-10 MR lymphography for target definition and follow-up in a patient undergoing image-guided, dose-escalated radiotherapy of lymph nodes upon PSA relapse.

Authors:  Anja M Weidner; Emile N J Th van Lin; Dietmar J Dinter; Tom Rozema; Stefan O Schoenberg; Frederik Wenz; Jelle O Barentsz; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  Assessment of nodal target definition and dosimetry using three different techniques: implications for re-defining the optimal pelvic field in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Susan Guo; Ronald D Ennis; Stephen Bhatia; Frieda Trichter; Benjamin Bashist; Jinesh Shah; Manjeet Chadha
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Biologically conformal treatment: biomarkers and functional imaging in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Yaacov Richard Lawrence; Maria Werner-Wasik; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: long-term outcome using IMRT and volumetric IGRT.

Authors:  M Guckenberger; I Lawrenz; M Flentje
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.