Literature DB >> 16253066

Randomized evaluation of Ureteral Stents using validated Symptom Questionnaire.

Courtney Lee1, Michael Kuskowski, Juan Premoli, Neil Skemp, Manoj Monga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Ureteral stents are associated with significant pain and urinary symptoms. Manufacturers have altered stent designs and materials in an attempt to minimize this morbidity. This study evaluated the impact of these modifications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stent manufacturers were asked to provide the 6F ureteral stent they believed would be associated with the least patient discomfort. Patients undergoing uncomplicated ureteroscopy were randomized to the Bard Inlay, Cook Endo-Sof, Microvasive Contour, Applied Medical Vertex, or Surgitek Classic Double-Pigtail stent. The Ureteric Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) was administered on days 1, 3, and 5, and the patients maintained a narcotic diary. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and nonparametric methods.
RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (73%) completed all USSQ questionnaires. Urinary symptom scores were significantly lower for the Inlay stent on day 3 than for the Vertex (P = 0.01), Contour (P = 0.05), Endo-Sof (P = 0.03), and Classic (P = 0.02) stents. No significant differences were noted in pain and general symptom scores or narcotic use.
CONCLUSIONS: The Bard Inlay stent is associated with less-severe urinary symptoms than other ureteral stents. The USSQ is a sensitive tool to measure differences between stents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253066     DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  16 in total

Review 1.  Current status of ureteral stent technologies: comfort and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Carlos E Mendez-Probst; Alfonso Fernandez; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones - Part 1.

Authors:  Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Özcan Kılıç; Murat Akand
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  [Influence of ureter stenting before ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi].

Authors:  J Mueller; N Riechert-Mühe; A J Schrader; A Leitenberger; J Steinestel; M A Kuczyk; S Steffens; R Hofmann; J Sotelino
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Update on ureteroscopy instrumentation.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

5.  Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; Glenn M Preminger; Evan R Goldfischer; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Intraureteral lidocaine for ureteral stent symptoms post-ureteroscopy: A randomized, phase 2, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Gregory Roberts; Robert Leslie; Sylvia Robb; D Robert Siemens; Darren Beiko
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Ureteral Stent Discomfort and Its Management.

Authors:  Katherine M Fischer; Michael Louie; Phillip Mucksavage
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Is stenting required before retrograde intrarenal surgery with access sheath.

Authors:  P M Mahajan; A S Padhye; A A Bhave; Y B Sovani; Y B Kshirsagar; S S Bapat
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-07

9.  Accessory instrumentation in flexible ureteroscopy: Evidence-based recommendation.

Authors:  Timothy Holden; Renato Nardi Pedro; Monoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10

10.  Ureteral stent discomfort: Etiology and management.

Authors:  Ricardo Miyaoka; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.