Literature DB >> 8361161

Accuracy of interface pressure measurement systems.

V Allen1, D W Ryan, N Lomax, A Murray.   

Abstract

Interface pressure measurement is needed to assess beds designed to prevent pressure sores, so it is therefore important to establish the accuracy of interface pressure measuring systems. In this study, the Talley SA500 pressure evaluator (with 28 mm and 100 mm sensor pads), the DIPE (with 100 mm sensor pad), and a water-filled bladder system (with 0.1 ml and 0.3 ml water) were assessed. Measurement errors were evaluated using a loading system with pressures up to 7.4 kPa (55 mm Hg) in steps of 0.9 kPa (6.9 mm Hg). All systems tested over-measured interface pressure, the error being approximately linearly proportional to the loading pressure. The repeatability for a given system was approximately constant. The mean error (+/- SD) (%) and repeatability (kPa) for the systems were: 28 mm Talley 12 +/- 1%, +/- 0.07 kPa; 100 mm Talley 15 +/- 1%, +/- 0.07 kPa; DIPE 27 +/- 3%, +/- 0.12 kPa; 0.1 ml water bladder 17 +/- 1%, +/- 0.13 kPa; 0.3 ml water bladder 26 +/- 3%, +/- 0.07 kPa. Different interfaces affected accuracy markedly, and repeatability was affected when an inhomogeneous interface was used. The study shows that the errors associated with interface pressure measurement systems can be substantial, and can vary from one system to another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8361161     DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(93)90014-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0141-5425


  8 in total

1.  [Interface pressure measurement in the treatment of pressure sores. Comparison with subcutaneous pressure values measured in healthy volunteers].

Authors:  H-U Völker; N Rölker; C Willy
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Evaluation of antidecubitus mattresses.

Authors:  A Jonsson; M Lindén; M Lindgren; L-A Malmqvist; Y Bäcklund
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.079

3.  The influence of backrest inclination on buttock pressure.

Authors:  Un Jin Park; Seong Ho Jang
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-12-30

4.  Efficacy of a pressure-sensing mattress cover system for reducing interface pressure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Holly Wong; Jaime Kaufman; Barry Baylis; John M Conly; David B Hogan; Henry T Stelfox; Danielle A Southern; William A Ghali; Chester H Ho
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Biomechanical and Physiological Evaluation of Respiratory Protective Equipment Application.

Authors:  Silvia Caggiari; Dan L Bader; Finn Foxell; Nicholas Pipe; Seana Couch; Abbie Turner; Peter R Worsley
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-07-26

6.  Investigating the effects of strap tension during non-invasive ventilation mask application: a combined biomechanical and biomarker approach.

Authors:  Peter R Worsley; George Prudden; George Gower; Dan L Bader
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-11-29

7.  Changes in Tissue Composition and Load Response After Transtibial Amputation Indicate Biomechanical Adaptation.

Authors:  J L Bramley; P R Worsley; D L Bader; C Everitt; A Darekar; L King; A S Dickinson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Investigating the effects of cervical collar design and fit on the biomechanical and biomarker reaction at the skin.

Authors:  Peter R Worsley; Nathan D Stanger; Aran K Horrell; Dan L Bader
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-03-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.