Literature DB >> 16251394

T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT.

Seishi Kumano1, Takamichi Murakami, Tonsok Kim, Masatoshi Hori, Riccardo Iannaccone, Saki Nakata, Hiromitsu Onishi, Keigo Osuga, Kaname Tomoda, Carlo Catalano, Hironobu Nakamura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the accuracy of multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of serosal invasion in patients with gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Ethics Committee does not require approval or informed consent for retrospective studies. Forty-one consecutive patients (24 men, 17 women; mean age, 68 years) with gastric cancer were included in this study. All patients were given 600 mL of tap water to drink and were positioned prone or supine on the scanning table. The detector row configuration included four detector rows, a section thickness of 1.25 mm, a pitch of 6, and a reconstruction interval of 0.63 mm. Transverse and multiplanar reconstruction images were simultaneously evaluated by two independent observers to assess the depth of tumor invasion in the gastric wall (ie, T stage). T staging at multi-detector row CT was compared with T staging at histologic evaluation (reference standard), which was performed by means of surgical or histologic examination of the resected specimen. We also calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of multi-detector row CT for each observer in the assessment of serosal invasion.
RESULTS: Analysis of interobserver agreement showed substantial or almost perfect agreement (nonweighted kappa value of 0.78 and weighted kappa value of 0.85). Correct assessment of gastric wall invasion was 80% and 85% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of multi-detector row CT in the assessment of serosal invasion were 90%, 95%, and 93%, respectively, for observer 1 and 80%, 97%, and 93%, respectively, for observer 2. Overstaging occurred in six patients, and understaging occurred in five patients. All understaged tumors were scirrhous subtype gastric cancer.
CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT scanning of patients with gastric cancer gave 93% accuracy in the assessment of serosal invasion in patients with gastric cancer. RSNA, 2005

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16251394     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2373041380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography is not accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tae Kyung Ha; Yun Young Choi; Soon Young Song; Sung Joon Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-08-03

2.  CT gastrography "wall-carving technique" of gastric cancer: impact of contrast enhancement based on layer depth.

Authors:  Daisuke Tsurumaru; Yusuke Nishimuta; Toshio Muraki; Yoshiki Asayama; Akihiro Nishie; Eiji Oki; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Elena Orsenigo; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Roberto Nicoletti; Luca Albarello; Alessandro Ambrosi; Annalaura Salerno; Antonio Esposito; Maria Chiara Petrone; Damiano Chiari; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Accuracy of multidetector-row CT in diagnosing lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takuro Saito; Yukinori Kurokawa; Shuji Takiguchi; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Impact of clinical tumor-node-metastasis staging on survival in gastric carcinoma patients receiving surgery.

Authors:  Etsuro Bando; Rie Makuuchi; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Sandro Pasquali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-06

7.  Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; C Zini; B Cavallo Marincola; D Geiger; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Determining gastric cancer resectability by dynamic MDCT.

Authors:  Zilai Pan; Huan Zhang; Chao Yan; Lianjun Du; Bei Ding; Qi Song; Huawei Ling; Baisong Huang; Kemin Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  CT volumetry for gastric carcinoma: association with TNM stage.

Authors:  James T P D Hallinan; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Luke Peter; Andrew Makmur; Wei Peng Yong; Jimmy B Y So
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Positioning during CT gastrography in patients with gastric cancer: the effect on gastric distension and lesion conspicuity.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Ah Young Kim; Jin Hug Lee; Jeong Hwan Yook; Eun Sil Yu; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.