Literature DB >> 16248729

Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement.

Anthony A Wright1, Juan D Delius.   

Abstract

Eight pigeons learned either matching (to sample) or oddity (from sample) with or without reward for sample responding. The training stimuli were coarse-white, fine-black, or smooth-mauve gravels in pots with buried grain as the reinforcer. Oddity without sample reward was learned most rapidly, followed by matching with sample reward, oddity with sample reward, and matching without sample reward. Transfer was related to acquisition rate: The oddity group without sample reward showed full (equal to baseline) color and texture transfer; the matching group with sample reward showed partial texture transfer; other groups showed no transfer. Sample reward was shown to determine rate of acquisition of matching and oddity and the oddity preference effect. The results are discussed in terms of item-specific associations operating early in learning prior to any relational learning between sample and comparison stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248729     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  5 in total

1.  Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.

Authors:  Katherine Bruce; Katherine Dyer; Michael Mathews; Catharine Nealley; Tiffany Phasukkan; Ashley Prichard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Learning strategies in matching to sample: if-then and configural learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Kent D Bodily; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2007-01-01

4.  The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas A Daniel; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus perform above chance in a "matching-to-sample" experiment.

Authors:  Mélisande Aellen; Ulrike E Siebeck; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.