Literature DB >> 16247349

Strategies for improved shock wave lithotripsy.

J A McAteer1, M R Bailey, J C Williams, R O Cleveland, A P Evan.   

Abstract

Research in lithotripsy that started with the effort to characterize acute shock wave damage to the kidney has led to advances on several fronts, including discovery of strategies that have improved clinical treatment. It is appreciated now that shock wave trauma is primarily a vascular lesion, that injury is dose dependent, and that hemorrhage can be severe and can lead to a permanent loss of functional renal mass. Studies of the renal functional response to lithotripsy have shown that shock wave treatment triggers vasoconstriction in the kidney. This finding has been turned to advantage, and it is now known that when treatment is begun using low amplitude pulses, subsequent high amplitude shock waves are far less damaging. Thus, when shock waves are delivered judiciously, treatment can have a protective effect. The finding that cavitation is a key mechanism in vessel rupture has led to the development of novel experimental methods of shock wave delivery that can suppress bubble expansion and minimize tissue damage. Progress has also been made in understanding the physical mechanisms involved in stone comminution, and it is seen that the forces generated by cavitation, shear stress and circumferential squeezing act synergistically to fragment stones. Recent work suggests that a broad focal zone may be an advantage, allowing stones to be broken with lower amplitude pulses. Cavitation has been shown to play a critical role in reducing stone fragments to a size that can be voided. Cavitation is also the factor that limits the rate at which treatment can be performed, as stones break significantly better at slow rate than at fast ratean observation from basic research that is now appreciated in clinical practice. The current environment in lithotripsy research is encouraging. There is great interest in developing new technology, and in finding ways to improve how lithotripsy is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16247349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol        ISSN: 0393-2249            Impact factor:   3.720


  14 in total

1.  A reduced-order, single-bubble cavitation model with applications to therapeutic ultrasound.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Management of kidney stones.

Authors:  Nicole L Miller; James E Lingeman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-03

3.  Beamwidth measurement of individual lithotripter shock waves.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Energy shielding by cavitation bubble clouds in burst wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Kazuki Maeda; Adam D Maxwell; Tim Colonius; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Nadine B Smith; Michael R Bailey; Gregory J Czarnota; Kullervo Hynynen; Inder Raj S Makin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Ultrasound-based triggered drug delivery to tumors.

Authors:  Ankit Jain; Ankita Tiwari; Amit Verma; Sanjay K Jain
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.617

7.  Design, fabrication, and characterization of broad beam transducers for fragmenting large renal calculi with burst wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Akshay Randad; Mohamed A Ghanem; Michael R Bailey; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  In Vitro Evaluation of Urinary Stone Comminution with a Clinical Burst Wave Lithotripsy System.

Authors:  Shivani Ramesh; Tony T Chen; Adam D Maxwell; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Jeff Thiel; James C Williams; Anthony Gardner; Ziyue Liu; Ian Metzler; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Strategies to optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome: Patient selection and treatment parameters.

Authors:  Michelle Jo Semins; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-06

10.  Pretreatment with low-energy shock waves reduces the renal oxidative stress and inflammation caused by high-energy shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Daniel L Clark; Bret A Connors; Rajash K Handa; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.