Literature DB >> 1624623

Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations.

R L Sakaguchi1, M C Peters, S R Nelson, W H Douglas, H W Poort.   

Abstract

Post-gel polymerization contraction of resin composite induces contraction stresses at the composite-tooth bond and in surrounding tooth structure. Strain gauges have been shown to be an effective method for measuring linear post-gel polymerization contraction of composites. A new model was developed in which the composite sample was bonded to and circumscribed by an acrylic ring. The model simulates a composite restoration surrounded by dentine. A strain gauge measured the deformation of the ring while a second strain gauge simultaneously recorded the dimensional change of the sample. Stresses placed on the acrylic ring as a result of polymerization contraction of the composite were calculated, based on the strains on the ring and the ring's material properties. Four composites (Heliomolar, Vivadent, Tonawanda, NY, USA; Herculite XR, Kerr Manufacturing Co., Romulus, MI, USA; P-50, 3M Co., St Paul, MN, USA; Silux Plus 3M Co.) were evaluated for polymerization contraction strain and stress on the surrounding acrylic ring during polymerization. At the end of the 60 s light application, Heliomolar demonstrated significantly lower post-gel contraction (0.12 per cent, P less than 0.05) when compared to the other materials. When the strain reached an equilibrium at the end of 14 min Heliomolar continued to demonstrate lower post-gel contraction, however this was not statistically significant at P less than 0.05. When the contraction stress on the surrounding acrylic ring was considered, P-50 rapidly developed and produced the largest stress values (1.7 MPa) at the end of the light application while Heliomolar produced the lowest stress values (0.3 MPa). These values, however, were not significantly different when evaluated statistically.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1624623     DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90133-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  7 in total

1.  The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite.

Authors:  Sérgio Kiyoshi Ishikiriama; Thiago Majolo Valeretto; Eduardo Batista Franco; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 2.  Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review.

Authors:  Dalia Kaisarly; Moataz El Gezawi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Effect of Different Composite Restorations on the Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Different Insertion Techniques- An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Sakshi Singhal; Anuraag Gurtu; Anurag Singhal; Rashmi Bansal; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

4.  Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel.

Authors:  Sahar E Abo-Hamar; Karl-Anton Hiller; Heike Jung; Marianne Federlin; Karl-Heinz Friedl; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Shrinkage Stresses Generated during Resin-Composite Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Luis Felipe J Schneider; Larissa Maria Cavalcante; Nick Silikas
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2009-09-30

6.  The effect of resin thickness on polymerization characteristics of silorane-based composite resin.

Authors:  Sung-Ae Son; Hyoung-Mee Roh; Bock Hur; Yong-Hoon Kwon; Jeong-Kil Park
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-09-05

7.  Effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement lining and composite layering technique on the adhesive interface of lateral wall.

Authors:  Larissa Marinho Azevedo; Leslie Carol Casas-Apayco; Carlos Andres Villavicencio Espinoza; Linda Wang; Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro; Maria Teresa Atta
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.