Literature DB >> 1624599

Simplified method of grading primary carcinomas of the breast.

D M Parham1, N Hagen, R A Brown.   

Abstract

AIMS: To produce a simplified prognostic index for breast cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 105 cases of primary infiltrating breast adenocarcinoma (not otherwise specified) was performed. Mitotic counts and semiquantitative assessment of tumour necrosis, fibrosis tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism were made in histological sections of the primary tumour. Statistical analysis was performed to determine which of these parameters best predicts the observed survival.
RESULTS: Mitotic count and necrosis correlated best with survival. This allowed the formation of a simple prognostic index based on these two parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: This new prognostic index, with four tumour grades, seemed to be superior to Bloom's grading method, with greater separation of the prognostic groups. In particular, there is clear segregation of a group of patients with a distinctly poor prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1624599      PMCID: PMC495227          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.45.6.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  9 in total

1.  Pathological findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project (Protocol No. 4). IV. Significance of tumor necrosis.

Authors:  E R Fisher; A S Palekar; R M Gregorio; C Redmond; B Fisher
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 2.  The clinical assessment of proliferation and growth in human tumours: evaluation of methods and applications as prognostic variables.

Authors:  C M Quinn; N A Wright
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.996

3.  Mitosis counting in tumors.

Authors:  J P Baak
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Predicting breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  B Stenkvist; E Bengtsson; B Dahlqvist; G Eklund; O Eriksson; T Jarkrans; B Nordin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Long-term survivors after breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Dixon; D L Page; T J Anderson; D Lee; R A Elton; H J Stewart; A P Forrest
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Predictors of recurrence and survival of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Russo; J Frederick; H E Ownby; G Fine; M Hussain; H I Krickstein; T O Robbins; B Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Baak; H Van Dop; P H Kurver; J Hermans
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Morphometric analysis of breast carcinoma: association with survival.

Authors:  D M Parham; A J Robertson; R A Brown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years.

Authors:  H J BLOOM; W W RICHARDSON
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Method for grading breast cancer.

Authors:  E W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  P D Brown
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Long term prognostic value of Nottingham histological grade and its components in early (pT1N0M0) breast carcinoma.

Authors:  S Frkovic-Grazio; M Bracko
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation.

Authors:  P Kronqvist; T Kuopio; Y Collan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Sialyl Lewis x expression in canine malignant mammary tumours: correlation with clinicopathological features and E-Cadherin expression.

Authors:  Salomé S Pinho; Augusto J F Matos; Célia Lopes; Nuno T Marcos; Júlio Carvalheira; Celso A Reis; Fátima Gärtner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Counting mitoses: SI(ze) matters!

Authors:  Ian A Cree; Puay Hoon Tan; William D Travis; Pieter Wesseling; Yukako Yagi; Valerie A White; Dilani Lokuhetty; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 7.842

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.