Literature DB >> 10817500

Morphometric grading of breast cancer: thresholds for tubular differentiation.

P Kronqvist1, T Kuopio, Y Collan.   

Abstract

We evaluated the degree of tubular differentiation in 172 samples of invasive ductal breast cancer in order to determine numerical thresholds for histological breast cancer grading. The tubular differentiation in each sample was defined as the fraction of fields showing tubular differentiation (FTD). The analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier curves reflecting survival and recurrence of disease, univariate and multivariate analyses of Cox's regression, and maximum efficiencies of ROC analysis. The minimum P-value cut-off for FTD was determined at 59%. The practical interpretation is that tubular differentiation in the neoplasm observed in at least 60% of microscopical fields in the tumour area indicates favourable prognosis of disease. The relative risks for breast cancer death for patients with FTD below 59% as compared with those with FTD above 59% were 6.7--and 6.3-fold (univariate and multivariate analyses respectively). Another threshold could be determined at FTD 23%, although this threshold was associated with clearly lower statistical significancies. The paper introduces two possible solutions for application of the thresholds to the morphometric breast cancer grading system. The study also emphasizes the clinical relevance of the evaluation of tubular differentiation in breast cancer. The consistent morphometric evaluation method was vital in allowing the full weight of the biological significance of tubular differentiation to emerge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10817500      PMCID: PMC2374503          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  40 in total

1.  Correlation of immunocytochemically demonstrated estrogen receptor distribution and histopathologic features in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  U Berger; P Wilson; R A McClelland; J Davidson; R C Coombes
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Pathologic correlates of survival in 378 lymph node-negative infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas. Mitotic count is the best single predictor.

Authors:  F Clayton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  General principles of grading lesions in diagnostic histopathology.

Authors:  Y Collan
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  The Multivariate Prognostic Index and nuclear DNA content are independent prognostic factors in primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J C van der Linden; J Lindeman; J P Baak; C J Meijer; C J Herman
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1989-01

Review 5.  Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors.

Authors:  D G Altman; B Lausen; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The pathology of invasive breast cancer. A syllabus derived from findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol no. 4).

Authors:  E R Fisher; R M Gregorio; B Fisher; C Redmond; F Vellios; S C Sommers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic and therapeutic significance of pathological features of breast cancer.

Authors:  E R Fisher
Journal:  NCI Monogr       Date:  1986

8.  Primary prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer with special reference to ductal carcinoma and histologic malignancy grade.

Authors:  J P Garne; K Aspegren; F Linell; F Rank; J Ranstam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement.

Authors:  P Robbins; S Pinder; N de Klerk; H Dawkins; J Harvey; G Sterrett; I Ellis; C Elston
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Morphometric grading of invasive ductal breast cancer. I. Thresholds for nuclear grade.

Authors:  P Kronqvist; T Kuopio; Y Collan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Accuracy of typing and grading invasive mammary carcinomas on core needle biopsy compared with the excisional specimen.

Authors:  Victor Piana de Andrade; Helenice Gobbi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  [Histological grading of breast cancer].

Authors:  M Christgen; F Länger; H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Lymph node status as a guide to selection of available prognostic markers in breast cancer: the clinical practice of the future?

Authors:  A Elzagheid; T Kuopio; S Pyrhönen; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.644

4.  Morphometrical malignancy grading is a valuable prognostic factor in invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  P Kronqvist; T Kuopio; P Jalava; Y Collan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.