Literature DB >> 4005802

The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer.

J P Baak, H Van Dop, P H Kurver, J Hermans.   

Abstract

In 271 breast cancer patients with adequate follow-up for at least 5.5 and maximally 12 years, the value of morphometry to classic prognosticators of breast cancer (tumor size and axillary lymph node status) was assessed. Previous studies had indicated the value of this quantitative microscopic technique. Apart from quantitative microscopic features, subjective qualitative features such as nuclear and histologic grade were assessed as well. Univariate life-table analysis showed the significance (p less than 0.001) of several features such as lymph node status, tumor size, nuclear and histologic grade, and several morphometric variables (mitotic activity index, mean and standard deviation of nuclear area). Cellularity index was also significant (p = 0.02). Survival analysis with Cox's regression model, using a stepwise selection as well as backwards elimination, pointed to three features: mitotic activity index, tumor size, and lymph node status. Mitotic activity was the most important prognostic feature, but the combination of these three features in a multivariate prognostic index had even more prognostic significance. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the 5-year survival of lymph node-negative patients (n = 146) is 85%, versus 93% in patients with a "good prognosis index" (n = 150). For lymph node-positive patients (n = 125), 5-year survival was 55%, compared with 47% in the "high index" (poor prognosis) patients (n = 121). Logistic discriminant analysis with 5.5-year follow-up as a fixed endpoint (191 survivors and 80 nonsurvivors) essentially gave the same results. Application of two instead of one decision threshold (e.g., numerical classification probability 0.60 and 0.40) decrease the number of false-negative and false-positive outcomes, however, with a number of patients falling in the class "uncertain." Thus, in agreement with other studies, morphometry significantly adds to the prognosis prediction of lymph node status and tumor size. Mitotic activity index is the best single predictor of the prognosis. An additional index advantage is that the multivariate model results in a continuous index variable that can be subdivided in many classes with an increasing risk of recurrence, so that more refined clinical therapeutic decision making is possible in individual patient care. The morphometric techniques are inexpensive and fairly simple and therefore can be applied in most pathology laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4005802     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<374::aid-cncr2820560229>3.0.co;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  66 in total

Review 1.  Proliferation markers in tumours: interpretation and clinical value.

Authors:  P J van Diest; G Brugal; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Galea; R W Blamey; C E Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Prognostic value of proliferative activity in lymph node metastases of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  P J van Diest; E Matze-Cok; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of extent of disease and morphometric and DNA flow cytometric prognostic factors in invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  A M Uyterlinde; N W Schipper; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  How malignant is malignant? A brief review of the microscopic assessment of human neoplasms, and the prediction of whether they will metastasize and kill.

Authors:  I Carr; N Pettigrew
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Nuclear morphometry in columnar cell lesions of the breast: is it useful?

Authors:  C N Lim; B C S Ho; B H Bay; G Yip; P H Tan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Determination of cell proliferation.

Authors:  D M Barnes; C E Gillett
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-02

8.  Prognostic value of morphometry in breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Baak; J C van der Linden; P J van Diest
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Morphometric analysis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma: discrimination between carcinoma and dysplasia.

Authors:  S Nakajo; M Yamamoto; E Tahara
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1989

10.  Ki-67 staining in histological subtypes of breast carcinoma and fine needle aspiration smears.

Authors:  V Kuenen-Boumeester; T H Van Der Kwast; H A Van Laarhoven; S C Henzen-Logmans
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.