Literature DB >> 16243641

Mass effect of injected dose in small rodent imaging by SPECT and PET.

Mei-Ping Kung1, Hank F Kung.   

Abstract

This paper discusses the effect of mass (chemical quantity) of injected dose on positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Commonly, PET or SPECT imaging study uses a "no-carrier added" dose, which contains a small amount of radioactive imaging agent (in picogram to microgram). For small animal (rodent) imaging studies, specifically targeting binding sites or biological processes, the mass (chemical quantity) in the dose may significantly modify the binding, pharmacokinetics and, ultimately, the imaging outcome. Due to differences in size and other physiological factors between humans and rodents, there is a dramatic divergence of mass effect between small animal and human imaging study. In small animal imaging studies, the mass, or effective dose (ED(50)), a dose required for 50% of receptor or binding site occupancy, is usually not directly related to binding potential (B(max)/K(d)) (measured by in vitro binding assay). It is likely that dynamic interplays between specific and nonspecific binding in blood circulation, transient lung retention, kidney excretion, liver-gallbladder flow, soft tissue retention as well as metabolism could each play a significant role in determining the concentration of the tracer in the target regions. When using small animal imaging for studying drug occupancy (either by a pretreatment, coinjection or chasing dose), the mass effects on imaging outcome are important factors for consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16243641     DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Biol        ISSN: 0969-8051            Impact factor:   2.408


  28 in total

1.  Targeting murine heart and brain: visualisation conditions for multi-pinhole SPECT with (99m)Tc- and (123)I-labelled probes.

Authors:  M Pissarek; J Meyer-Kirchrath; T Hohlfeld; S Vollmar; A M Oros-Peusquens; U Flögel; C Jacoby; U Krügel; N Schramm
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  A review of imaging agent development.

Authors:  Eric D Agdeppa; Mary E Spilker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  In vivo bacteriophage peptide display to tailor pharmacokinetics of biological nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jessica R Newton-Northup; Marie T Dickerson; Senthil R Kumar; George P Smith; Thomas P Quinn; Susan L Deutscher
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Performing radiosynthesis in microvolumes to maximize molar activity of tracers for positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Maxim E Sergeev; Mark Lazari; Federica Morgia; Jeffrey Collins; Muhammad Rashed Javed; Olga Sergeeva; Jason Jones; Michael E Phelps; Jason T Lee; Pei Yuin Keng; R Michael van Dam
Journal:  Commun Chem       Date:  2018-03-22

5.  Type 1 cannabinoid receptor mapping with [18F]MK-9470 PET in the rat brain after quinolinic acid lesion: a comparison to dopamine receptors and glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Cindy Casteels; Emili Martinez; Guy Bormans; Lluïsa Camon; Núria de Vera; Veerle Baekelandt; Anna M Planas; Koen Van Laere
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  SPECT detectors: the Anger Camera and beyond.

Authors:  Todd E Peterson; Lars R Furenlid
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  High yield and high specific activity synthesis of [18F]fallypride in a batch microfluidic reactor for micro-PET imaging.

Authors:  Muhammad Rashed Javed; Supin Chen; Jack Lei; Jeffrey Collins; Maxim Sergeev; Hee-Kwon Kim; Chang-Jin Kim; R Michael van Dam; Pei Yuin Keng
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Digital Microfluidics: A New Paradigm for Radiochemistry.

Authors:  Pei Yuin Keng; R Michael van Dam
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  [(18)F]Fallypride dopamine D2 receptor studies using delayed microPET scans and a modified Logan plot.

Authors:  Mohammed N Tantawy; Carrie K Jones; Ronald M Baldwin; M Sib Ansari; P Jeffrey Conn; Robert M Kessler; Todd E Peterson
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  What were they thinking? Cognitive states may influence [11C]raclopride binding potential in the striatum.

Authors:  Karmen K Yoder; David A Kareken; Evan D Morris
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.