Literature DB >> 25319709

Neurons in the nucleus accumbens promote selection bias for nearer objects.

Sara E Morrison1, Saleem M Nicola2.   

Abstract

Both animals and humans often prefer rewarding options that are nearby over those that are distant, but the neural mechanisms underlying this bias are unclear. Here we present evidence that a proximity signal encoded by neurons in the nucleus accumbens drives proximate reward bias by promoting impulsive approach to nearby reward-associated objects. On a novel decision-making task, rats chose the nearer option even when it resulted in greater effort expenditure and delay to reward; therefore, proximate reward bias was unlikely to be caused by effort or delay discounting. The activity of individual neurons in the nucleus accumbens did not consistently encode the reward or effort associated with specific alternatives, suggesting that it does not participate in weighing the values of options. In contrast, proximity encoding was consistent and did not depend on the subsequent choice, implying that accumbens activity drives approach to the nearest rewarding option regardless of its specific associated reward size or effort level.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3414147-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; effort; impulsivity; nucleus accumbens; proximity; reward

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25319709      PMCID: PMC4198548          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2197-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

1.  Statistical discrimination of natural modes of motion in rat exploratory behavior.

Authors:  D Drai; Y Benjamini; I Golani
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Cue-evoked firing of nucleus accumbens neurons encodes motivational significance during a discriminative stimulus task.

Authors:  Saleem M Nicola; Irene A Yun; Ken T Wakabayashi; Howard L Fields
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; A Farrar; S M Mingote
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  An inexpensive drivable cannulated microelectrode array for simultaneous unit recording and drug infusion in the same brain nucleus of behaving rats.

Authors:  Johann du Hoffmann; James J Kim; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Dopamine invigorates reward seeking by promoting cue-evoked excitation in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Johann du Hoffmann; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Nucleus accumbens neurons encode predicted and ongoing reward costs in rats.

Authors:  Jeremy J Day; Joshua L Jones; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Dynamic coding of goal-directed paths by orbital prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  James J Young; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Invigoration of reward seeking by cue and proximity encoding in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Vincent B McGinty; Sylvie Lardeux; Sharif A Taha; James J Kim; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Divergent effects of D₂/₃ receptor activation in the nucleus accumbens core and shell on impulsivity and locomotor activity in high and low impulsive rats.

Authors:  M Moreno; D Economidou; A C Mar; C López-Granero; D Caprioli; D E Theobald; A Fernando; A H Newman; T W Robbins; Jeffrey W Dalley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  12 in total

1.  Limbic-motor integration by neural excitations and inhibitions in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Sara E Morrison; Vincent B McGinty; Johann du Hoffmann; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Habits without values.

Authors:  Kevin J Miller; Amitai Shenhav; Elliot A Ludvig
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Reassessing wanting and liking in the study of mesolimbic influence on food intake.

Authors:  Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Dopamine invigorates reward seeking by promoting cue-evoked excitation in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Johann du Hoffmann; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Nucleus Accumbens Core Is Necessary for Responding to Incentive But Not Instructive Stimuli.

Authors:  Mehdi Sicre; Julie Meffre; Didier Louber; Frederic Ambroggi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dopamine and Proximity in Motivation and Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Michael Frank
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-01-04

7.  Activation of Dopamine Receptors in the Nucleus Accumbens Promotes Sucrose-Reinforced Cued Approach Behavior.

Authors:  Johann du Hoffmann; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell Differentially Encode Reward-Associated Cues after Reinforcer Devaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A West; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Sign tracking predicts suboptimal behavior in a rodent gambling task.

Authors:  Megan Swintosky; James T Brennan; Corrine Koziel; John P Paulus; Sara E Morrison
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.415

10.  Sign Tracking, but Not Goal Tracking, is Resistant to Outcome Devaluation.

Authors:  Sara E Morrison; Michael A Bamkole; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.