Hyunjo Lee1, Moshe A Mizrahi1, Jed A Hartings2,3, Sameer Sharma1, Laura Pahren4, Laura B Ngwenya2,3,5, Brian D Moseley5, Michael Privitera5, Frank C Tortella6, Brandon Foreman1. 1. Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology & Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. 3. Neurotrauma Center at University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute, Cincinnati, OH. 4. College of Engineering and Applied Science, Cincinnati, OH. 5. Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. 6. Brain Trauma, Neuroprotection and Neurorestoration Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: After traumatic brain injury, continuous electroencephalography is widely used to detect electrographic seizures. With the development of standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology, we aimed to describe the prevalence and burden of ictal-interictal patterns, including electrographic seizures after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury and to correlate continuous electroencephalography features with functional outcome. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the prospective, randomized controlled phase 2 multicenter INTREPID study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00805818). Continuous electroencephalography was initiated upon admission to the ICU. The primary outcome was the 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Consensus electroencephalography reviews were performed by raters certified in standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology blinded to clinical data. Rhythmic, periodic, or ictal patterns were referred to as "ictal-interictal continuum"; severe ictal-interictal continuum was defined as greater than or equal to 1.5 Hz lateralized rhythmic delta activity or generalized periodic discharges and any lateralized periodic discharges or electrographic seizures. SETTING: Twenty U.S. level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Patients with nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury and postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4-12 were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 152 patients with continuous electroencephalography (age 34 ± 14 yr; 88% male), 22 (14%) had severe ictal-interictal continuum including electrographic seizures in four (2.6%). Severe ictal-interictal continuum burden correlated with initial prognostic scores, including the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (r = 0.51; p = 0.01) and Injury Severity Score (r = 0.49; p = 0.01), but not with functional outcome. After controlling clinical covariates, unfavorable outcome was independently associated with absence of posterior dominant rhythm (common odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.30-9.09), absence of N2 sleep transients (3.69; 1.69-8.20), predominant delta activity (2.82; 1.32-6.10), and discontinuous background (5.33; 2.28-12.96) within the first 72 hours of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Severe ictal-interictal continuum patterns, including electrographic seizures, were associated with clinical markers of injury severity but not functional outcome in this prospective cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Importantly, continuous electroencephalography background features were independently associated with functional outcome and improved the area under the curve of existing, validated predictive models.
OBJECTIVES: After traumatic brain injury, continuous electroencephalography is widely used to detect electrographic seizures. With the development of standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology, we aimed to describe the prevalence and burden of ictal-interictal patterns, including electrographic seizures after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury and to correlate continuous electroencephalography features with functional outcome. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the prospective, randomized controlled phase 2 multicenter INTREPID study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00805818). Continuous electroencephalography was initiated upon admission to the ICU. The primary outcome was the 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Consensus electroencephalography reviews were performed by raters certified in standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology blinded to clinical data. Rhythmic, periodic, or ictal patterns were referred to as "ictal-interictal continuum"; severe ictal-interictal continuum was defined as greater than or equal to 1.5 Hz lateralized rhythmic delta activity or generalized periodic discharges and any lateralized periodic discharges or electrographic seizures. SETTING: Twenty U.S. level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Patients with nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury and postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4-12 were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 152 patients with continuous electroencephalography (age 34 ± 14 yr; 88% male), 22 (14%) had severe ictal-interictal continuum including electrographic seizures in four (2.6%). Severe ictal-interictal continuum burden correlated with initial prognostic scores, including the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (r = 0.51; p = 0.01) and Injury Severity Score (r = 0.49; p = 0.01), but not with functional outcome. After controlling clinical covariates, unfavorable outcome was independently associated with absence of posterior dominant rhythm (common odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.30-9.09), absence of N2 sleep transients (3.69; 1.69-8.20), predominant delta activity (2.82; 1.32-6.10), and discontinuous background (5.33; 2.28-12.96) within the first 72 hours of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Severe ictal-interictal continuum patterns, including electrographic seizures, were associated with clinical markers of injury severity but not functional outcome in this prospective cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Importantly, continuous electroencephalography background features were independently associated with functional outcome and improved the area under the curve of existing, validated predictive models.
Authors: Els C Husson; Gerard M Ribbers; Agnes H P Willemse-van Son; Arianne P Verhagen; Henk J Stam Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Susan T Herman; Nicholas S Abend; Thomas P Bleck; Kevin E Chapman; Frank W Drislane; Ronald G Emerson; Elizabeth E Gerard; Cecil D Hahn; Aatif M Husain; Peter W Kaplan; Suzette M LaRoche; Marc R Nuwer; Mark Quigg; James J Riviello; Sarah E Schmitt; Liberty A Simmons; Tammy N Tsuchida; Lawrence J Hirsch Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Khalid A Alsherbini; Joao Mc-OʼNeil Plancher; David M Ficker; Brandon P Foreman; Opeolu M Adeoye; Jun Ying; Michael D Privitera Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Kate Liesemer; Susan L Bratton; C Michelle Zebrack; Douglas Brockmeyer; Kimberly D Statler Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: P M Vespa; D L McArthur; Y Xu; M Eliseo; M Etchepare; I Dinov; J Alger; T P Glenn; D Hovda Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Matthew B Maas; Bryan D Lizza; Sabra M Abbott; Eric M Liotta; Maged Gendy; John Eed; Andrew M Naidech; Kathryn J Reid; Phyllis C Zee Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Matthew B Maas; Bryan D Lizza; Minjee Kim; Sabra M Abbott; Maged Gendy; Kathryn J Reid; Phyllis C Zee Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Brandon Foreman; Hyunjo Lee; David O Okonkwo; Anthony J Strong; Clemens Pahl; Lori A Shutter; Jens P Dreier; Laura B Ngwenya; Jed A Hartings Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 3.532
Authors: Marjolein E Haveman; Michel J A M Van Putten; Harold W Hom; Carin J Eertman-Meyer; Albertus Beishuizen; Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans Journal: Crit Care Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 9.097