Literature DB >> 1623586

Charts of operational process specifications ("OPSpecs charts") for assessing the precision, accuracy, and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria.

J O Westgard1.   

Abstract

"Operational process specifications" have been derived from an analytical quality-planning model to assess the precision, accuracy, and quality control (QC) needed to satisfy Proficiency Testing (PT) criteria. These routine operating specifications are presented in the form of an "OPSpecs chart," which describes the operational limits for imprecision and inaccuracy when a desired level of quality assurance is provided by a specific QC procedure. OPSpecs charts can be used to compare the operational limits for different QC procedures and to select a QC procedure that is appropriate for the precision and accuracy of a specific measurement procedure. To select a QC procedure, one plots the inaccuracy and imprecision observed for a measurement procedure on the OPSpecs chart to define the current operating point, which is then compared with the operational limits of candidate QC procedures. Any QC procedure whose operational limits are greater than the measurement procedure's operating point will provide a known assurance, with the percent chance specified by the OPSpecs chart, that critical analytical errors will be detected. OPSpecs charts for a 10% PT criterion are presented to illustrate the selection of QC procedures for measurement procedures with different amounts of imprecision and inaccuracy. Normalized OPSpecs charts are presented to permit a more general assessment of the analytical performance required with commonly used QC procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1623586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  8 in total

Review 1.  Perspective on the clinical laboratory: new uses for informatics.

Authors:  R A McPherson
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Quality leadership and quality control.

Authors:  Tony Badrick
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2003-08

3.  The relationships between common measures of glucose meter performance.

Authors:  Daniel R Wilmoth
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

4.  A comparative study on reliability of point of care sodium and potassium estimation in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Viswas Chhapola; Sandeep Kumar Kanwal; Rajni Sharma; Virendra Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  A Validation Study of After Reconstitution Stability of Diabetes: Level 1 and Diabetes Level 2 Controls.

Authors:  Shyamali Pal
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 6.  Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories.

Authors:  Sten Westgard; Hassan Bayat; James O Westgard
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

7.  Estimation of the optimal statistical quality control sampling time intervals using a residual risk measure.

Authors:  Aristides T Hatjimihail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens?

Authors:  Timothy K Amukele; Lori J Sokoll; Daniel Pepper; Dana P Howard; Jeff Street
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.