Literature DB >> 16234323

Improving the efficiency of SPR moves in phylogenetic tree search methods based on maximum likelihood.

Wim Hordijk1, Olivier Gascuel.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Maximum likelihood (ML) methods have become very popular for constructing phylogenetic trees from sequence data. However, despite noticeable recent progress, with large and difficult datasets (e.g. multiple genes with conflicting signals) current ML programs still require huge computing time and can become trapped in bad local optima of the likelihood function. When this occurs, the resulting trees may still show some of the defects (e.g. long branch attraction) of starting trees obtained using fast distance or parsimony programs.
METHODS: Subtree pruning and regrafting (SPR) topological rearrangements are usually sufficient to intensively search the tree space. Here, we propose two new methods to make SPR moves more efficient. The first method uses a fast distance-based approach to detect the least promising candidate SPR moves, which are then simply discarded. The second method locally estimates the change in likelihood for any remaining potential SPRs, as opposed to globally evaluating the entire tree for each possible move. These two methods are implemented in a new algorithm with a sophisticated filtering strategy, which efficiently selects potential SPRs and concentrates most of the likelihood computation on the promising moves.
RESULTS: Experiments with real datasets comprising 35-250 taxa show that, while indeed greatly reducing the amount of computation, our approach provides likelihood values at least as good as those of the best-known ML methods so far and is very robust to poor starting trees. Furthermore, combining our new SPR algorithm with local moves such as PHYML's nearest neighbor interchanges, the time needed to find good solutions can sometimes be reduced even more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16234323     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  72 in total

1.  Widespread horizontal gene transfer from double-stranded RNA viruses to eukaryotic nuclear genomes.

Authors:  Huiquan Liu; Yanping Fu; Daohong Jiang; Guoqing Li; Jiatao Xie; Jiasen Cheng; Youliang Peng; Said A Ghabrial; Xianhong Yi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Using confidence set heuristics during topology search improves the robustness of phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Shirley L Pepke; Davin Butt; Isabelle Nadeau; Andrew J Roger; Christian Blouin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria.

Authors:  Nicolas Lartillot; Hervé Philippe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Phylogenetic mixture models for proteins.

Authors:  Si Quang Le; Nicolas Lartillot; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Combinatorics of distance-based tree inference.

Authors:  Fabio Pardi; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Novel Probiotic Mechanisms of the Oral Bacterium Streptococcus sp. A12 as Explored with Functional Genomics.

Authors:  K Lee; A R Walker; B Chakraborty; J R Kaspar; M M Nascimento; R A Burne
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Tentacle Transcriptomes of the Speckled Anemone (Actiniaria: Actiniidae: Oulactis sp.): Venom-Related Components and Their Domain Structure.

Authors:  Michela L Mitchell; Gerry Q Tonkin-Hill; Rodrigo A V Morales; Anthony W Purcell; Anthony T Papenfuss; Raymond S Norton
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Bayes estimators for phylogenetic reconstruction.

Authors:  P M Huggins; W Li; D Haws; T Friedrich; J Liu; R Yoshida
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Dengue viruses cluster antigenically but not as discrete serotypes.

Authors:  Leah C Katzelnick; Judith M Fonville; Gregory D Gromowski; Jose Bustos Arriaga; Angela Green; Sarah L James; Louis Lau; Magelda Montoya; Chunling Wang; Laura A VanBlargan; Colin A Russell; Hlaing Myat Thu; Theodore C Pierson; Philippe Buchy; John G Aaskov; Jorge L Muñoz-Jordán; Nikos Vasilakis; Robert V Gibbons; Robert B Tesh; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Ron A M Fouchier; Anna Durbin; Cameron P Simmons; Edward C Holmes; Eva Harris; Stephen S Whitehead; Derek J Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Efficient tree searches with available algorithms.

Authors:  Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 1.625

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.