Literature DB >> 17160642

Using confidence set heuristics during topology search improves the robustness of phylogenetic inference.

Shirley L Pepke1, Davin Butt, Isabelle Nadeau, Andrew J Roger, Christian Blouin.   

Abstract

We examine the impact of likelihood surface characteristics on phylogenetic inference. Amino acid data sets simulated from topologies with branch length features chosen to represent varying degrees of difficulty for likelihood maximization are analyzed. We present situations where the tree found to achieve the global maximum in likelihood is often not equal to the true tree. We use the program covSEARCH to demonstrate how the use of adaptively sized pools of candidate trees that are updated using confidence tests results in solution sets that are highly likely to contain the true tree. This approach requires more computation than traditional maximum likelihood methods, hence covSEARCH is best suited to small to medium-sized alignments or large alignments with some constrained nodes. The majority rule consensus tree computed from the confidence sets also proves to be different from the generating topology. Although low phylogenetic signal in the input alignment can result in large confidence sets of trees, some biological information can still be obtained based on nodes that exhibit high support within the confidence set. Two real data examples are analyzed: mammal mitochondrial proteins and a small tubulin alignment. We conclude that the technique of confidence set optimization can significantly improve the robustness of phylogenetic inference at a reasonable computational cost. Additionally, when either very short internal branches or very long terminal branches are present, confident resolution of specific bipartitions or subtrees, rather than whole-tree phylogenies, may be the most realistic goal for phylogenetic methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17160642     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-006-0072-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  26 in total

1.  Scaling of accuracy in extremely large phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  O R Bininda-Emonds; S G Brady; J Kim; M J Sanderson
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2001

2.  Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees.

Authors:  Korbinian Strimmer; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Multiple maxima of likelihood in phylogenetic trees: an analytic approach.

Authors:  B Chor; M D Hendy; B R Holland; D Penny
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Congruent evidence from alpha-tubulin and beta-tubulin gene phylogenies for a zygomycete origin of microsporidia.

Authors:  Patrick J Keeling
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.495

5.  Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics.

Authors:  N Goldman; J P Anderson; A G Rodrigo
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Shimodaira
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Conflicting phylogenetic signals at the base of the metazoan tree.

Authors:  Antonis Rokas; Nicole King; John Finnerty; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  David D Pollock; Derrick J Zwickl; Jimmy A McGuire; David M Hillis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy.

Authors:  Antonis Rokas; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: identifiability and consistency.

Authors:  J T Chang
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 2.144

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.