| Literature DB >> 16232313 |
Kerstin Hoef-Emden1, Hoang-Dung Tran, Michael Melkonian.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plastid-bearing cryptophytes like Cryptomonas contain four genomes in a cell, the nucleus, the nucleomorph, the plastid genome and the mitochondrial genome. Comparative phylogenetic analyses encompassing DNA sequences from three different genomes were performed on nineteen photosynthetic and four colorless Cryptomonas strains. Twenty-three rbcL genes and fourteen nuclear SSU rDNA sequences were newly sequenced to examine the impact of photosynthesis loss on codon usage in the rbcL genes, and to compare the rbcL gene phylogeny in terms of tree topology and evolutionary rates with phylogenies inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA (concatenated SSU rDNA, ITS2 and partial LSU rDNA), and nucleomorph SSU rDNA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16232313 PMCID: PMC1285359 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-56
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Unrooted maximum likelihood trees of DNA sequences representing three different genomes of the cryptophyte genus . Figure 1A – Tree inferred from concatenated nuclear SSU rDNA, ITS2 and partial LSU rDNA sequences. Evolutionary model, GTR+I+Γ [51]; -ln L = 9254.5. Figure 1B – Nucleomorph SSU rDNA phylogeny. Evolutionary model, TVM+I+Γ [51]; -ln L = 4899.1. Figure 1C – Tree inferred from plastid-encoded rbcL genes (for a rooted tree including rbcL genes of other cryptophyte genera, see Additional file 3). Evolutionary model, GTR+I+Γ [51]; -ln L = 7857.4. Figure 1D (inlet) – Nuclear (top), nucleomorph (middle) and plastid (bottom) phylogeny scaled to the same substitution rate. Gray shaded areas in Figures 1A to C, presumed position of the root. In a rooted phylogeny inferred from a concatenated data set of nuclear (ITS2 excluded), nucleomorph and plastid DNA sequences with Guillardia theta as an outgroup, the root inserted between clade NoPyr and all other taxa (see Additional file 4). Evolutionary models were chosen according to the results of the Akaike information criterion in Modeltest (see Additional file 1 and Methods). Support values from left to right, maximum likelihood bootstrap/maximum parsimony bootstrap/distance (neighbor-joining) bootstrap/posterior probabilities (Figures 1A and B) or maximum likelihood bootstrap/maximum parsimony bootstrap/distance (neighbor-joining) bootstrap/logdet transformation bootstrap/posterior probabilities (Figure 1C). Cbo, Cryptomonas borealis; Ccu, C. curvata; Cgy, C. gyropyrenoidosa; Clu, C. lundii; Cma, C. marssonii; Cov, C. ovata; Cpa, C. paramaecium (colorless); Cpy, C. pyrenoidifera; Cte, C. tetrapyrenoidosa; blue, taxa of clade LB; red branches and strain designations, loss of photosynthesis; scale bars, substitutions per site.
Figure 2Chart diagram displaying genetic divergences among the taxa and across the three data sets. A strain from a clade with inconspicuous branch lengths in all three phylogenies, Cryptomonas pyrenoidifera strain M1077, was chosen as a reference. The distance values represent the genetic divergences of strain M1077 to the other taxa. The distance values were extracted from the maximum likelihood distance matrices used otherwise by Paup to infer the neighbor-joining trees during phylogenetic analyses, and fed into a spread-sheet program. Strains CCMP 152, CCAC 0031 and M2180 were genetically identical to strains M1077, CCAP 979/46 and CCAC 0056, respectively, thus, were omitted from the chart diagram. Nucleus, concatenated nuclear SSU rDNA, ITS2 and partial LSU rDNA; nucleomorph, nucleomorph SSU rDNA; plastid, rbcL gene. Taxon designations (abscissa): py, C. pyrenoidifera CCAP 979/61; ma1, C. marssonii CCAC 0086; ma2, C. marssonii CCAC 0103; cu1, C. curvata CCAC 0006; cu2, C. curvata CCAC 0080; te1, C. tetrapyrenoidosa M1092; te2, C. tetrapyrenoidosa NIES 279; ov1, C. ovata CCAC 0064; ov2, C. ovata M1171; NP1, NoPyr strain CCAP 979/46; NP2, NoPyr strain CCAC 0109; NP3, NoPyr strain M0741; gy, C. gyropyrenoidosa CCAC 0108; lu, C. lundii CCAC 0107; bo1, C. borealis CCAC 0113; bo2, C. borealis SCCAP K-0063; pa1, C. paramaecium M2452; pa2, C. paramaecium CCAP 977/1; pa3, C. paramaecium CCAC 0056.
Codon usage of two-fold degenerate NNY codons in Cryptomonas sp. and Guillardia theta rbcL
| Clade | Asn | His | Asp | Tyr | Cys | Phe |
| Strain | ||||||
| 15/0 | 8/2 | 12/8 | 12/3 | 0/7 | 12/5 | |
| CCAC 0006 | 13/2 | 7/3 | 10/5 | 4/5 | 14/3 | |
| CCAC 0080 | 13/2 | 10/10 | 11/4 | 3/6 | 11/6 | |
| CCAC 0086 | 16/0 | 6/4 | 14/6 | 12/3 | 1/7 | 11/6 |
| CCAC 0103 | 15/1 | 6/4 | 10/9 | 13/2 | 2/5 | 10/3 |
| CCAC 0064 | 8/8 | 8/2 | 0/8 | 10/7 | ||
| M1171 | 10/6 | 5/5 | 1/7 | 10/7 | ||
| CCAP 979/61 | 15/0 | 8/2 | 12/8 | 13/3 | 0/7 | 12/5 |
| CCMP 152 and M1077 | 15/0 | 9/1 | 13/7 | 12/3 | 1/6 | 13/4 |
| M1092 | 13/3 | 8/2 | 13/6 | 10/5 | 3/5 | 12/5 |
| NIES 279 | 12/4 | 8/2 | 10/9 | 10/5 | 1/7 | 13/4 |
| NoPyr | ||||||
| CCAC 0031 and CCAP 979/46 | 15/0 | 10/0 | 14/6 | 13/2 | 4/3 | 16/1 |
| CCAC 0109 | 15/0 | 9/1 | 15/5 | 10/5 | 1/5 | 15/2 |
| M0741 | 15/0 | 6/4 | 13/7 | 9/6 | 3/3 | 15/2 |
| CCAC 0108 | 12/4 | 5/5 | 11/4 | 1/5 | 12/6 | |
| CCAC 0107 | 12/4 | 6/4 | 0/7 | 9/8 | ||
| CCAC 0113 | 0/8 | |||||
| SCCAP K-0063 | 8/7 | 1/7 | ||||
| CCAC 0056 and M2180 | 0/7 | |||||
| CCAP 977/1 | 6/4 | 1/6 | ||||
| M2452 | 1/6 | |||||
The entries for the rbcL genes in Table 1 refer to absolute counts per 396 amino acids (= 1188 nucleotide positions). Also for the Guillardia theta rbcL gene only the corresponding 396 of the 488 codons were used. The plastid of G. theta contains genes for 30 tRNAs [10]. Only the NNC codons (underlined) are served by an exactly matching tRNA. As a code table, the eubacterial/plastid code was used (code table 11). Bold face, changed codon usage from NNC to NNU = shift from selection bias to genome composition bias.
List of Cryptomonas strains examined in this study with accession numbers to EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ entries
| Species/Clade | Strain | Nucleus | Nucleom. | Plastid | |
| ITS2+LSUp | SSU rDNA | SSU rDNA | |||
| CCAC 0113 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| SCCAP K-0063 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAC 0006 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAC 0080 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAC 0108 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAC 0107 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAC 0086 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAC 0103 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAC 0064 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| M1171 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAC 0056 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAP 977/1 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| M2180 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| M2452 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAP 979/61 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCMP 152 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| M1077 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| M1092 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| NIES 279 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| NoPyr | CCAC 0031 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: |
| CCAC 0109 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| CCAP 979/46 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
| M0741 | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | [EMBL: | |
Abbreviations: CCAC, Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Cologne (Germany); CCAP, Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (UK); CCMP, Provasoli-Guillard Center for the Culture of Marine Phytoplankton (USA); ITS2, nuclear internal transcribed spacer 2; LSUp, partial nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA (28S rDNA or LSU rDNA, approx. 800 nt of 5' terminus); M, Algal Culture Collection Melkonian at the University of Cologne (Germany); NIES, Culture Collection of The National Institute for Environmental Studies (Japan); rbcL, large subunit gene of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; SCCAP, Scandinavian Culture Centre for Algae and Protozoa (Denmark); SSU rDNA, small subunit ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA, nuclear or nucleomorph).
New sequences: acc. nos. AM051188 to AM051224.