Literature DB >> 16231300

Dependency between consecutive local conformations helps assemble protein structures from secondary structures using Go potential and greedy algorithm.

Pierre Tuffery1, Philippe Derreumaux.   

Abstract

Discretization of protein conformational space and fragment assembly methods simplify the search of native structures. These methods, mostly of Monte Carlo and genetic-type, do not exploit, however, the fact that short fragments describing consecutive parts of proteins are conformation-dependent. Yet, this information should be useful in improving ab initio and comparative protein structure modeling. In a preliminary study, we have assessed the possibility of using greedy algorithms for protein structure reconstruction based on the assembly of fragments of four-residue length. Greedy algorithms differ from Monte Carlo and genetic approaches in that they grow a polypeptide chain one fragment after another. Here, we move one step further in complexity, and provide strong evidence that the dependence between consecutive local conformations during assembly makes possible the reconstruction of protein structures from their secondary structures using a Go potential. Overall our procedure can reproduce 20 protein structures of 50-164 amino acids within 2.7 to 6.5 A RMSd and is able to identify native topologies for all proteins, although some targets are stabilized by very long-range interactions. Proteins 2005. 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16231300     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  9 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Assessing protein conformational sampling methods based on bivariate lag-distributions of backbone angles.

Authors:  Mehdi Maadooliat; Xin Gao; Jianhua Z Huang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Predicting the molecular interactions of CRIP1a-cannabinoid 1 receptor with integrated molecular modeling approaches.

Authors:  Mostafa H Ahmed; Glen E Kellogg; Dana E Selley; Martin K Safo; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Structural alphabets derived from attractors in conformational space.

Authors:  Alessandro Pandini; Arianna Fornili; Jens Kleinjung
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Discriminative learning for protein conformation sampling.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Shuaicheng Li; Beckett W Sterner; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-10

Review 6.  The OPEP protein model: from single molecules, amyloid formation, crowding and hydrodynamics to DNA/RNA systems.

Authors:  Fabio Sterpone; Simone Melchionna; Pierre Tuffery; Samuela Pasquali; Normand Mousseau; Tristan Cragnolini; Yassmine Chebaro; Jean-Francois St-Pierre; Maria Kalimeri; Alessandro Barducci; Yoann Laurin; Alex Tek; Marc Baaden; Phuong Hoang Nguyen; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  SABBAC: online Structural Alphabet-based protein BackBone reconstruction from Alpha-Carbon trace.

Authors:  Julien Maupetit; R Gautier; Pierre Tufféry
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Structural deformation upon protein-protein interaction: a structural alphabet approach.

Authors:  Juliette Martin; Leslie Regad; Hélène Lecornet; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-28

9.  PEP-FOLD: an online resource for de novo peptide structure prediction.

Authors:  Julien Maupetit; Philippe Derreumaux; Pierre Tuffery
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.