Literature DB >> 3681970

Interior and surface of monomeric proteins.

S Miller1, J Janin, A M Lesk, C Chothia.   

Abstract

The solvent-accessible surface area (As) of 46 monomeric proteins is calculated using atomic co-ordinates from high-resolution and well-refined crystal structures. The As of these proteins can be determined to within 1 to 2% and that of their individual residues to within 10 to 20%. The As values of proteins are correlated with their molecular weight (Mr) in the range 4000 to 35,000: the power law As = 6.3 M0.73 predicts protein As values to within 4% on average. The average water-accessible surface is found to be 57% non-polar, 24% polar and 19% charged, with 5% root-mean-square variations. The molecular surface buried inside the protein is 58% non-polar, 39% polar and 4% charged. The buried surface contains more uncharged polar groups (mostly peptides) than the surface that remains accessible, but many fewer charged groups. On average, 15% of residues in small proteins and 32% in larger ones may be classed as "buried residues", having less than 5% of their surface accessible to the solvent. The accessibilities of most other residues are evenly distributed in the range 5 to 50%. Although the fraction of buried residues increases with molecular weight, the amino acid compositions of the protein interior and surface show no systematic variation with molecular weight, except for small proteins that are often very rich in buried cysteines. From amino acid compositions of protein surfaces and interiors we calculate an effective coefficient of partition for each type of residue, and derive an implied set of transfer free energy values. This is compared with other sets of partition coefficients derived directly from experimental data. The extent to which groups of residues (charged, polar and non-polar) are buried within proteins correlates well with their hydrophobicity derived from amino acid transfer experiments. Within these three groups, the correlation is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3681970     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90038-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  244 in total

1.  Distinguishing between sequential and nonsequentially folded proteins: implications for folding and misfolding.

Authors:  C J Tsai; J V Maizel; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Thermodynamics of DNA binding of MM17, a 'single chain dimer' of transcription factor MASH-1.

Authors:  M Sieber; R K Allemann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Persistently conserved positions in structurally similar, sequence dissimilar proteins: roles in preserving protein fold and function.

Authors:  Iddo Friedberg; Hanah Margalit
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Composites of local structure propensities: evidence for local encoding of long-range structure.

Authors:  David Shortle
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Heat capacity changes upon burial of polar and nonpolar groups in proteins.

Authors:  V V Loladze; D N Ermolenko; G I Makhatadze
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  A mechanism for the evolution of phosphorylation sites.

Authors:  Samuel M Pearlman; Zach Serber; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  On hydrophobicity and conformational specificity in proteins.

Authors:  Erik Sandelin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Propensities, probabilities, and the Boltzmann hypothesis.

Authors:  David Shortle
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Correlation between sequence hydrophobicity and surface-exposure pattern of database proteins.

Authors:  Susanne Moelbert; Eldon Emberly; Chao Tang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Probing weakly polar interactions in cytochrome c.

Authors:  D S Auld; G B Young; A J Saunders; D F Doyle; S F Betz; G J Pielak
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.