Literature DB >> 16230545

Mortality and complications after stoma closure.

Herwig Pokorny1, Harald Herkner, Raimund Jakesz, Friedrich Herbst.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: This study was undertaken to evaluate factors contributing to hospital mortality and complications of stoma closure.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Department of Surgery of a 2500-bed university hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive eligible patients who underwent stoma closure were selected from a local registry containing 30 219 patients. The medical records of 587 adult patients were reviewed according to a predefined extraction form. Patients with additional, unrelated surgical interventions or younger than 18 years were excluded. Follow-up was complete for all included patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome variable was 30-day mortality; the secondary outcome variable was presence of surgery-related complications within 30 days.
RESULTS: We analyzed 533 patients with stoma closure between 1993 and 2001. The overall stoma closure-related mortality rate was 3% (15 patients); the overall stoma closure-related surgical complications rate was 20% (107 patients). Wound infections (9%) and anastomotic leakage (5%) were the most common surgical complications. Age was the only significant risk factor for survival (P = .02). Use of a soft silicone drain for intraperitoneal drainage (odds ratio, 1.62 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.45]; P = .03) was the only significant risk factor for complications. In patients with carcinoma as the primary disease (odds ratio, 0.61 [95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.93]; P = .02), we observed significantly fewer complications.
CONCLUSIONS: We found considerable mortality and complications after stoma closure. Apart from age, we could not identify any predictor for mortality in patients with stoma closure. Randomized studies are needed to determine whether certain types of drains influence outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16230545     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.10.956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  18 in total

1.  Indications for and complications of intestinal stomas in the children and adults at a tertiary care hospital in a resource-limited setting: a Tanzanian experience.

Authors:  Alicia Massenga; Alfred Chibwae; Aloyce A Nuri; Merchades Bugimbi; Yasin K Munisi; Ramadhani Mfinanga; Phillipo L Chalya
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Nonsurgical faecal diversion in the management of severe perianal sepsis: a retrospective evaluation of the flexible faecal management system.

Authors:  Minghui Goh; Min-Hoe Chew; Phui-Sze Au-Yong; Choo-Eng Ong; Choong-Leong Tang
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seok In Seo; Chang Sik Yu; Gwon Sik Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The effects of platelet-rich-plasma gel application to the colonic anastomosis in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: An experimental rat model.

Authors:  Sonmez Ocak; Omer F Buk; Bugra Genc; Bahattin Avcı; Hatice O Uzuner; Salih B Gundogdu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Contemporary non-surgical approach for faecal diversion in a case of Fournier's gangrene.

Authors:  Harsh Sheth; Shilpa Ashutosh Rao; Karthik Venkataramani
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-22

6.  Fast-Tracking Colostomy Closures.

Authors:  Aditya J Nanavati; Subramaniam Prabhakar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Ileostomy reversal with handsewn techniques. Short-term outcomes in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Francesco Terracciano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Michele Sacco; Roberto Peltrini; Viviana Sollazzo; Emanuela Spadarella; Cristina Bucci; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Prophylactic mesh reinforcement reduces stomal site incisional hernia after ileostomy closure.

Authors:  David Shi Hao Liu; Elisabeth Banham; Srinivasa Yellapu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Factors related to anastomotic dehiscence and mortality after terminal stomal closure in the management of patients with severe secondary peritonitis.

Authors:  José L Martínez; Enrique Luque-de-León; Pablo Andrade
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Quality of life in rectal cancer surgery: What do the patient ask?

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma; Gaetano Luglio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.