| Literature DB >> 32504109 |
Csaba F Vad1,2, Claudia Schneider3,4, Dunja Lukić3,4, Zsófia Horváth3,5, Martin J Kainz3, Herwig Stibor6, Robert Ptacnik3.
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that global climate change promotes the dominance of mixotrophic class="Species">algae eclass="Chemical">specially in oligotrophic aquatic ecosystems. While theory predicts that mixotrophy increases trophic transfer efficiency in aquatic food webs, deleterious effects of some mixotrophs on consumers have also been reported. Here, using a wideclass="Chemical">spread mixotrophic algal genus Dinobryon, we aimed to quantify how colonial taxa contribute to secondary production in lakes. We, therefore, studied the dietary effects of <class="Chemical">span class="Species">Dinobryon divergens on Cladocera (Daphnia longispina) and Copepoda (Eudiaptomus gracilis), representing two main taxonomic and functional groups of zooplankton. In feeding experiments, we showed that Dinobryon was largely grazing resistant and even inhibited the uptake of the high-quality reference food in Daphnia. Eudiaptomus could to some extent compensate with selective feeding, but a negative long-term food quality effect was also evident. Besides, Eudiaptomus was more sensitive to the pure diet of Dinobryon than Daphnia. Low lipid content and high C:P elemental ratio further supported the low nutritional value of the mixotroph. In a stable isotope approach analysing a natural plankton community, we found further evidence that carbon of Dinobryon was not conveyed efficiently to zooplankton. Our results show that the increasing dominance of colonial mixotrophs can result in reduced dietary energy transfer to consumers at higher trophic levels. In a wider perspective, global climate change favours the dominance of some detrimental mixotrophic algae which may constrain pelagic trophic transfer efficiency in oligotrophic systems, similarly to cyanobacteria in eutrophic lakes.Entities:
Keywords: Dinobryon; Food web; Mixotrophic chrysophytes; Nutritional value; Zooplankton
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32504109 PMCID: PMC7320944 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04677-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oecologia ISSN: 0029-8549 Impact factor: 3.225
Features of the cultivated Dinobryon divergens and Cryptomonas sp. used in the grazing experiments
| Average cell biovolume (µm3) | 287.1 ± 74.0 | 400.7 ± 109.8 |
| Average length of individual loricas (µm) | 35.9 ± 4.5 | – |
| Average width of individual loricas (µm) | 9.5 ± 1.5 | – |
| Average length of 2-cell colonies incl. loricas (µm) | 66.0 ± 3.3 | – |
| Average length of 3-cell colonies incl. loricas (µm) | 96.4 ± 4.5 | – |
| % of naked (without lorica) single cells of all cells | 12.9 | – |
| % of single cells with lorica of all cells | 17.6 | – |
| Average colony size excluding empty loricas (no. of all cells/sum of all single cells and colonies) | 1.9 ± 1.4 | – |
| Max. number of cells per colony | 12 | |
| Average colony size including empty loricas (no. of all loricas/sum of all single loricas and those in colonies) | 2.1 ± 1.6 | – |
| % of empty loricas/all loricas | 27.7 | – |
Biovolume and length (± SD) values are based on measurements of 30 cells in the cultures, while other features on inspecting > 600 cells or colonies
Fig. 1Biomass (carbon) ingestion rates (mean ± SD, N = 3 per treatment) of aEudiaptomus gracilis and bDaphnia longispina on Cryptomonas sp. and Dinobryon divergens separately (left) and the total ingested biomass (right; dashed lines denote the standard error of the predictions) on algae mixtures with increasing ratio of D. divergens (generalized additive model for E. gracilis ingestion rate: adj. R = 0.57, approximate significance of smooth term p < 0.001, N = 15; for D. longispina: adj. R = 0.88, p < 0.001, N = 15)
Results of one-way ANOVA testing for treatment-specific differences in the ingestion rates on the reference food Cryptomonas
| Treatments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3.90 | 0.055 | 0% = 25% = 50% > 75% | |
| 3 | 25.11 | < 0.001 | 0% > 25% > 50% = 75% |
Treatments (increasing share of Dinobryon divergens) are ordered based on post hoc Tukey’s HSD tests (‘ = ’ stands for non-significant, while ‘ > ’ for significant differences)
Fig. 2Ingestion rate on Cryptomonas sp. (mean ± 95% confidence interval, N = 3 per treatment for both zooplankton species) relative to the unialgal Cryptomonas treatment in the three experimental treatments with mixed food (i.e., increasing ratio of Dinobryon divergens). The dashed 1:1 line indicates a theoretical mean grazing rate with no feeding selectivity or feeding inhibition, with coloured bands representing the 95% confidence interval calculated from the ingestion rates on unialgal Cryptomonas diet
Fig. 3Survival on the different food types a and cumulative number of juveniles b in Eudiaptomus gracilis and Daphnia longispina fed with Cryptomonas sp. (C), Dinobryon divergens (D) and their 1:1 mixture (M) during the experimental period (21 days, N = 10 per treatment). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments based on post hoc tests (Tukey HSD or Dunn’s test depending on the applied statistics) are indicated by letters. Note that in the case of cumulative number of juveniles in E. gracilis, significance is based on square root-transformed data but on the figure, we present the row data for an easier visualization of the original units. The detailed results of the applied statistics (Kruskal–Wallis test or one-way ANOVA) are presented in Supplementary Information, Table S2
Fig. 4Cumulative number of juveniles per females (mean ± SD, N = 10 per treatment) in Daphnia longispina over the course of the experiment on the three food types (C—Cryptomonas sp., D—Dinobryon divergens, M—1:1 mixture). Coloured background indicates the time interval where number of juveniles in the Cryptomonas treatment significantly exceeded those on the other two (based on the results of one-way ANOVAs or Kruskal–Wallis tests, with post hoc tests for treatment-specific differences). Treatments with D. divergens and mixed food never differed significantly from each other
Fig. 5The total lipid content (left; mean ± SD calculated for technical replicates, N = 3) and fatty acid (FA) composition (right) of the two algal species used as food in the experiments. PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acids, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acids, SAFA saturated fatty acids
The atomic carbon:phosphorus (C:P) and nitrogen:phosphorus (N:P) ratio (mean ± SD stand for technical replicates) of the two algae
| C:P | N:P | |
|---|---|---|
| 504.5 ± 7.9 | 33.9 ± 0.9 | |
| 151.9 ± 6.2 | 21.5 ± 0.9 |
Fig. 6Stable isotope biplot (mean ± SD, N = 3) representing the trophic positions of planktonic groups or species in Lake Lunz