Literature DB >> 16227973

Evidence for de novo imprinted X-chromosome inactivation independent of meiotic inactivation in mice.

Ikuhiro Okamoto1, Danielle Arnaud, Patricia Le Baccon, Arie P Otte, Christine M Disteche, Philip Avner, Edith Heard.   

Abstract

In mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated in females to enable dosage compensation for X-linked gene products. In rodents and marsupials, only the X chromosome of paternal origin (Xp) is silenced during early embryogenesis. This could be due to a carry-over effect of the X chromosome's passage through the male germ line, where it becomes transiently silenced together with the Y chromosome, during meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI). Here we show that Xist (X inactive specific transcript) transgenes, located on autosomes, do not undergo MSCI in the male germ line of mice and yet can induce imprinted cis-inactivation when paternally inherited, with identical kinetics to the Xp chromosome. This suggests that MSCI is not necessary for imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice. We also show that the Xp is transcribed, like autosomes, at zygotic gene activation rather than being 'pre-inactivated'. We propose that expression of the paternal Xist gene at zygotic gene activation is sufficient to trigger cis-inactivation of the X chromosome, or of an autosome carrying a Xist transgene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16227973     DOI: 10.1038/nature04155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  75 in total

1.  Two-step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse.

Authors:  Satoshi H Namekawa; Bernhard Payer; Khanh D Huynh; Rudolf Jaenisch; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Xist imprinting is promoted by the hemizygous (unpaired) state in the male germ line.

Authors:  Sha Sun; Bernhard Payer; Satoshi Namekawa; Jee Young An; William Press; Jovani Catalan-Dibene; Hongjae Sunwoo; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  X-chromosome inactivation and escape.

Authors:  Christine M Disteche; Joel B Berletch
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 4.  Xist and the order of silencing.

Authors:  Karen Ng; Dieter Pullirsch; Martin Leeb; Anton Wutz
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced.

Authors:  Julie Chaumeil; Patricia Le Baccon; Anton Wutz; Edith Heard
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  Meiotic silencing and the epigenetics of sex.

Authors:  William G Kelly; Rodolfo Aramayo
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Epigenetic processes implemented during spermatogenesis distinguish the paternal pronucleus in the embryo.

Authors:  Tammy F Wu; Diana S Chu
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Specific patterns of histone marks accompany X chromosome inactivation in a marsupial.

Authors:  Edda Koina; Julie Chaumeil; Ian K Greaves; David J Tremethick; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 9.  New twists in X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Erwin; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Long noncoding RNAs in mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency and differentiation.

Authors:  Marcel E Dinger; Paulo P Amaral; Tim R Mercer; Ken C Pang; Stephen J Bruce; Brooke B Gardiner; Marjan E Askarian-Amiri; Kelin Ru; Giulia Soldà; Cas Simons; Susan M Sunkin; Mark L Crowe; Sean M Grimmond; Andrew C Perkins; John S Mattick
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.