Literature DB >> 16227478

Conventional radiographs vs digitized radiographs: image quality assessment.

N Parissis1, A Kondylidou-Sidira, A Tsirlis, P Patias.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare image quality characteristics of conventional radiographs and their digital counterparts.
METHODS: 100 conventional radiographs (E-speed) were used for the evaluation of density and contrast. The radiographs were made using a range of exposures under standardized conditions and were compared with digital images that resulted from scanning the above radiographs with a commercially available scanner. Resolution was evaluated with an experiment using 50 film packets and a resolution target exposed with different exposure times, using both the original radiographs and their scanned equivalents.
RESULTS: The digitized radiographs appeared to be of higher density than the conventional ones. Moreover, they demonstrated a narrower density range. Resolution was similar for both types of images.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an agreement with the literature that the digitized radiographs are of higher density, further investigation is required to detect the various factors that may have an effect on the quality of the digitized images.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16227478     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/99611204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  6 in total

1.  Scanning technology selection impacts acceptability and usefulness of image-rich content.

Authors:  Kristine M Alpi; James C Brown; Jennifer A Neel; Carol B Grindem; Keith E Linder; James B Harper
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-01

2.  Alternative X-ray filters for an intra-oral digital radiographic system.

Authors:  J Stecke; A D Cruz; S M Almeida; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of radiographic measurements obtained with conventional and indirect digital imaging during endodontic treatment.

Authors:  Ligia Buloto Schmitd; Tatiana de Castro Lima; Luiz Eduardo Montenegro Chinellato; Clóvis Monteiro Bramante; Roberto Brandão Garcia; Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes; Norberti Bernardineli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  A Subjective Assessment of Perceived Clarity of Indirect Digital Images and Processed Digital Images with Conventional Intra-oral Periapical Radiographs.

Authors:  Suchetha N Malleshi; Mahima V G; Anudeepa Raina; Karthikeya Patil
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

5.  Evaluation of the effects of processing delays and protective plastic cases on image quality of a photostimulable phosphor plate system.

Authors:  Clóvis Monteiro Bramante; Alexandre Silva Bramante; Rogério Emílio de Souza; Ivaldo Gomes Moraes; Norberti Bernardineli; Roberto Brandão Garcia
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  The best radiographic method for determining root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: A study of Chinese descendants in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Tzu-Yi Lu; Yi-Chen Chen; Shue-Fen Yang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.080

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.