Literature DB >> 28580267

Fatigue Behavior of Nitinol Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft and Inappropriate Femoral Tunnel Placement: Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

Fatih Karaaslan1, Sinan Karaoğlu2.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is the most common ligament injury in the knee, and progressive instability and disability may develop in a significant number of patients. The incidence of ACL reconstruction is rapidly increasing, as is the number of failures. Although ACL reconstruction is a common procedure, less than satisfactory outcomes have been reported to occur in up to 25% of patients. The reasons for clinical failure after ACL reconstruction are numerous but can be broadly separated into 3 categories: technical, biological, and mechanical failures. It is generally thought that poor tunnel positioning (especially the femoral tunnel) is the most common technical error. Revision ACL reconstruction can be performed in 1 or 2 stages. The decision to perform a multistage approach is based on the position and size of the original tunnels. The varied success rates and associated advantages and disadvantages of each method have resulted in controversy as to the best treatment for revision ACL surgery. We describe our preferred operative technique to remove a fractured nitinol synthetic ACL graft and manage single-stage revision ACL reconstruction without bone grafting.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28580267      PMCID: PMC5443615          DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthrosc Tech        ISSN: 2212-6287


  7 in total

1.  Tunnel widening in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Travis G Maak; James E Voos; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  The effects of semitendinosus and gracilis harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert T Burks; Julia Crim; Barbara P Fink; Douglas N Boylan; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Current concepts in anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; J H Wilckens
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1990-11

Review 4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice.

Authors:  Daniel A Shaerf; Philip S Pastides; Khaled M Sarraf; Charles A Willis-Owen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

5.  Comparative study of autograft or allograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  T Kustos; L Bálint; P Than; Tamás Bárdos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament graft choices.

Authors:  Alec A Macaulay; Dean C Perfetti; William N Levine
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Patient Outcomes and Predictors of Success After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  William R Johnson; Amun Makani; Andrew J Wall; Ali Hosseini; Perry Hampilos; Guoan Li; Thomas J Gill
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.