OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new handheld vacuum delivery device. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK. POPULATION: One hundred and ninety-four women requiring delivery with vacuum extraction. METHODS: Women were recruited into the study while still in early labour. If during delivery, vacuum extraction was indicated they were then randomly allocated to either a new handheld vacuum device, the Kiwi Omnicup, or to a 'standard' vacuum cup selected by the obstetrician. The 'standard group' consisted of the silastic (66/98, 67%) or the metal cups (32/98, 33%). Study data were recorded at completion of the delivery and at 24-48 hours. An additional brief symptom questionnaire was completed by the mother at 10 days postnatally. Statistical analyses were done on an 'intention-to-treat' basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the successful completion of delivery with the allocated instrument. Secondary outcomes were substantial fetal scalp trauma and substantial maternal trauma. RESULTS: The Omnicup was associated with a significantly higher failure rate than the standard cup [34%vs 21%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.9 (1.01-3.6)]. This difference persisted after adjusting for confounding factors [adjusted OR = 2.25 (1.01-5.0)] and resulted in significantly more forceps deliveries in the Kiwi Omnicup group [22%vs 10%, unadjusted OR = 2.5 (1.1-5.5)]. The caesarean section rates were similar in both groups [9.4%vs 8.2%, OR = 1.2 (0.4-3.2)]. Rates of substantial scalp trauma and maternal trauma were similar in both groups. However, there were more cases of jaundice in the standard cup group [2.3%vs 12.0%, unadjusted OR = 0.18 (0.04-0.82) and adjusted OR = 0.10 (0.01-0.88)]. CONCLUSIONS: The Omnicup is not as successful at achieving a vaginal delivery as the combination of the currently used vacuum cups.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new handheld vacuum delivery device. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK. POPULATION: One hundred and ninety-four women requiring delivery with vacuum extraction. METHODS:Women were recruited into the study while still in early labour. If during delivery, vacuum extraction was indicated they were then randomly allocated to either a new handheld vacuum device, the Kiwi Omnicup, or to a 'standard' vacuum cup selected by the obstetrician. The 'standard group' consisted of the silastic (66/98, 67%) or the metal cups (32/98, 33%). Study data were recorded at completion of the delivery and at 24-48 hours. An additional brief symptom questionnaire was completed by the mother at 10 days postnatally. Statistical analyses were done on an 'intention-to-treat' basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the successful completion of delivery with the allocated instrument. Secondary outcomes were substantial fetal scalp trauma and substantial maternal trauma. RESULTS: The Omnicup was associated with a significantly higher failure rate than the standard cup [34%vs 21%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.9 (1.01-3.6)]. This difference persisted after adjusting for confounding factors [adjusted OR = 2.25 (1.01-5.0)] and resulted in significantly more forceps deliveries in the Kiwi Omnicup group [22%vs 10%, unadjusted OR = 2.5 (1.1-5.5)]. The caesarean section rates were similar in both groups [9.4%vs 8.2%, OR = 1.2 (0.4-3.2)]. Rates of substantial scalp trauma and maternal trauma were similar in both groups. However, there were more cases of jaundice in the standard cup group [2.3%vs 12.0%, unadjusted OR = 0.18 (0.04-0.82) and adjusted OR = 0.10 (0.01-0.88)]. CONCLUSIONS: The Omnicup is not as successful at achieving a vaginal delivery as the combination of the currently used vacuum cups.
Authors: W Siggelkow; N Schwarz; M W Beckmann; S Kehl; F Faschingbauer; R L Schild Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Ganga L Verma; Jessica J Spalding; Marc D Wilkinson; G Justus Hofmeyr; Valerie Vannevel; Fidelma O'Mahony Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-24
Authors: Emily J Hotton; Erik Lenguerrand; Mary Alvarez; Stephen O'Brien; Tim J Draycott; Joanna F Crofts Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-12-13 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: E A Huhn; E Visca; D R Vogt; S von Felten; E M Tinner Oehler; C Bührer; D Surbek; R Zimmermann; I Hoesli Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Stephen O'Brien; Emily J Hotton; Erik Lenguerrand; Julia Wade; Cathy Winter; Tim J Draycott; Joanna F Crofts Journal: Trials Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 2.279