Literature DB >> 16222448

Histological grading in gastric cancer by Ming classification: correlation with histopathological subtypes, metastasis, and prognosis.

Thomas Luebke1, Stephan E Baldus, Guido Grass, Elfriede Bollschweiler, Jürgen Thiele, Hans-Peter Dienes, Arnulf H Hoelscher, Stefan P Moenig.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to analyze Ming's classification in correlation with other currently used classification systems of gastric cancer. In addition, we wanted to define the prognostic significance of the Ming classification system. The present study analyzed material of 117 patients with gastric carcinoma who underwent D2-gastrectomy with curative intent. All specimens were categorized according to International Union Against Cancer (UICC) classification, World Health Organization (WHO) classification, Borrmann classification, Laurén classification, Goseki classification, Ming classification, and tumor differentiation. For analysis of correlation between the classification systems, the correlation coefficient according to Spearman was calculated. The survival curves have been calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. According to the Ming classification, 38.5% of the carcinomas exhibited an expanding growth pattern, and 61.5% of specimens showed an infiltrating growth pattern. The subtypes according to the Ming and Laurén classification correlated significantly (P < 0.001). WHO classification (P < 0.001), tumor differentiation (P < 0.001), and Goseki classification (P < 0.001), as well as the macroscopic classification of Borrmann (P < 0.001) and the pT and pN categories of the UICC classification exhibited a highly significant correlation with the Ming classification (P < 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Median overall survival was 31.3 months. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 3-year survival rates were lower in the infiltrative tumor type when compared to the expansive tumor type according to Ming (P = 0.0847). In multivariate analysis, only the UICC system presented as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). This study shows that the Ming classification correlates significantly with the currently used classification systems for gastric cancer and with the UICC staging system, especially, the pT and pN category. The 3-year survival rates were lower in the infiltrative tumor type than in the expansive tumor type according to Ming. However, the Ming classification is not an independent prognostic factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16222448     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7795-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.282


  26 in total

1.  Pathologic and phenotypic features of gastric cancer.

Authors:  C M Fenoglio-Preiser; A E Noffsinger; J Belli; G N Stemmermann
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  [Tubular differentiated stomach carcinoma of the (Ming) infiltrating type].

Authors:  K Dirschmid; R Scheiden; G Zimmermann; G Mathis; J Kiesler
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  The World Health Organization's histologic classification of gastrointestinal tumors. A commentary on the second edition.

Authors:  J R Jass; L H Sobin; H Watanabe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  [Does Ming's classification of gastric carcinomas have epidemiologic or prognostic value?].

Authors:  F Piard; P Hillon; P Levillain; M C Boutron; C Milan; R Michiels; J Faivre
Journal:  Ann Pathol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 0.407

Review 5.  Histogenesis and biologic behavior of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  R M Mulligan
Journal:  Pathol Annu       Date:  1972

6.  Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and pyloric stenosis: histological differentiation.

Authors:  A Watanabe; T Oshiro; H Oiwa; S Ohno; Y Adachi; H Anai; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr

7.  Differences between biopsy- or specimen-related Laurén and World Health Organization classification in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Uta Flucke; Stefan P Mönig; Stephan E Baldus; Thomas K Zirbes; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Jürgen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Cellular and molecular pathology of gastric carcinoma and precursor lesions: A critical review.

Authors:  Si-Chun Ming
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  [Prognostic value of the Lauren and Ming classifications in gastric adenocarcinoma. Multidimensional analysis].

Authors:  P Garnier; P Vielh; B Asselain; J C Durand; J Girodet; J P Pilleron; R J Salmon
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1988 Jun-Jul

10.  Prognostic significance of Lauren and Ming classifications and other pathologic parameters in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M M Ribeiro; J A Sarmento; M A Sobrinho Simões; J Bastos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  15 in total

1.  Circulating methylated MINT2 promoter DNA is a potential poor prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jing Han; Ping Lv; Jiang-Liu Yu; Yi-Chen Wu; Xin Zhu; Lian-Lian Hong; Wang-Yu Zhu; Qi-Ming Yu; Xin-Bao Wang; Pei Li; Zhi-Qiang Ling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Correlation of Primary Tumor FDG Uptake with Histopathologic Features of Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Hae Won Kim; Kyoung Sook Won; Bong-Il Song; Yu Na Kang
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-25

3.  Enhanced serum methylated p16 DNAs is associated with the progression of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Chen Wu; Ping Lv; Jing Han; Jiang-Liu Yu; Xin Zhu; Lian-Lian Hong; Wang-Yu Zhu; Qi-Ming Yu; Xin-Bao Wang; Pei Li; Zhi-Qiang Ling
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 4.  Pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer: diagnostic relevance and prognostic value.

Authors:  Felix Berlth; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Uta Drebber; Arnulf H Hoelscher; Stefan Moenig
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Prognostic risk factors of early gastric cancer-a western experience.

Authors:  Thomas Haist; Hartmut Pritzer; Michael Pauthner; Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff; Dietmar Lorenz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  New invasive patterns as a prognostic factor for superficial esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Eisuke Ito; Soji Ozawa; Hiroshi Kijima; Akihito Kazuno; Takayuki Nishi; Osamu Chino; Hideo Shimada; Makiko Tanaka; Shigeaki Inoue; Sadaki Inokuchi; Hiroyasu Makuuchi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Inhibition of circRNA circVPS33B Reduces Warburg Effect and Tumor Growth Through Regulating the miR-873-5p/HNRNPK Axis in Infiltrative Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yizhuo Lu; Jia Cheng; Wangyu Cai; Huiqin Zhuo; Guoyang Wu; Jianchun Cai
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Identification of Stemness Characteristics Associated With the Immune Microenvironment and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Deli Mao; Zhijun Zhou; Shenglei Song; Dongsheng Li; Yulong He; Zhewei Wei; Changhua Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Circulating Methylated XAF1 DNA Indicates Poor Prognosis for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Ling; Ping Lv; Xiao-Xiao Lu; Jiang-Liu Yu; Jing Han; Li-Sha Ying; Xin Zhu; Wang-Yu Zhu; Xian-Hua Fang; Shi Wang; Yi-Chen Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Association of ERBB2 gene status with histopathological parameters and disease-specific survival in gastric carcinoma patients.

Authors:  J D Barros-Silva; D Leitão; L Afonso; J Vieira; M Dinis-Ribeiro; M Fragoso; M J Bento; L Santos; P Ferreira; S Rêgo; C Brandão; F Carneiro; C Lopes; F Schmitt; M R Teixeira
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.